Risk Matrix
Retirement Plans' Investment Program

"A" = Actual Control "P" = Proposed Control

            CONTROLS                
THREATS C-1 Multiple actuarial reviews C-2 Reciprocity agreements were subject to Board, union, administration, and actuarial review C-3 Subject to annual audit by KPMG C-4 Investment transactions are correctly and promptly recorded C-5 Quarterly reports from investment managers review performance against benchmarks C-6 Independent investment advisors review investment manager performance on a quarterly basis C-7 Retirement Unit is beginning to track portfolio performance internally C-8 Investment contracts follow standard industry practices C-9 Investment contracts are negotiated in the best interests of both parties C-10 Non-performing investment managers are terminated C-11 Portfolio is in compliance with investment policies C-12 Subject to Board review C-13 City's asset allocation plan is comparable to other jurisdictions C-14 Payroll contributions are computed correctly and transferred promptly
T-1 PERS RECIPROCITY COSTS MAY EXCEED EXPECTATIONS A A                        
T-2 ACTUARIAL ESTIMATE OF PENSION BENEFIT OBLIGATION MAY BE OVERSTATED A   A                      
T-3 INVESTMENT MANAGERS MAY UNDERPERFORM THE MARKET       A A A A     A A A    
T-4 INVESTMENT MANAGER FEE STRUCTURES MAY NOT ADEQUATELY REWARD GOOD PERFORMANCE OR PUNISH POOR PERFORMANCE         A     A A A        

|CSJ Home Page| Auditor's Home Page|Risk Matrix Library|

If you have any questions or comments about this web page, please send comments to webmaster minh.nguyen@ci.sj.ca.us. Last revised July 25, 2002.