Subject:  APPROVAL OF BUSINESS TERMS FOR AN ACQUISITION/ PREDEVELOPMENT LOAN AND A FUND RESERVATION FOR CONSTRUCTION AND PERMANENT FINANCING TO ROEM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, OR ITS DESIGNATED PARTNERSHIP, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED MCLAUGHLIN AVENUE SENIOR APARTMENTS.

 

COUNCIL DISTRICT 7

 

REASON FOR ADDENDUM

 

Developer’s Option to purchase expires on May 23, 2001.  Therefore, City Council action is necessary on May 22, 2001 in order to secure the subject property for affordable housing development.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:

 

1.      Approving business terms for an acquisition/predevelopment loan of up to $2,450,000 to ROEM Development Corporation, or its designated partnership, for a 61-unit housing development affordable to very low–income senior households on a 1.55-acre site located at 1275 McLaughlin Avenue, south of Owsley Avenue.

 

2.      Finding that the use of 20% Housing Funds for the project is of benefit to the Redevelopment Project Areas in San Jose.

 

BACKGROUND

 

On April 19, 2001, Roem Development Corporation submitted a loan application to the Housing Department for the acquisition, construction and permanent financing of the McLaughlin Avenue

 

Apartments.   The development consists of 60 one-bedroom units and one two-bedroom unit.  The sponsor is requesting $2,450,000 in City financing for acquisition and predevelopment expenses.

 

The sponsor is seeking City financing to purchase the site and finance predevelopment expenses in the short term. Staff will come back to the Council for approval of construction/permanent loan business terms at a later date. 

 

A commitment of funds at this time is necessary to demonstrate City participation in the project for a tax credit application being submitted to the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (CTCAC) in June 2001.

 

ANALYSIS

 

The proposed development is located on a 1.55-acre site at 1275 McLaughlin Avenue, south of Owsley Avenue. The site is currently improved with a former industrial building and yard, and an abandoned single-family home. 

 

In the current funding proposal, the sponsor intends to fund the project through a combination of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit equity, a conventional loan, developer equity and City loan proceeds. 

 

The current financing proposal is based upon an affordability mix of 45% of the units at 45% of Median Income, 54% of the units at 50% of Median Income and one unrestricted manager’s unit.  The total cost to acquire the property and construction of the improvements is estimated to be $11,046,701.

 

In accordance with the Replacement Housing Plan, Downtown Development Projects, adopted by the Redevelopment Agency Board in January 2000 and the Replacement Housing Plan, Hellyer-Piercy Improvement District, adopted by the Redevelopment Agency Board in February 2001 (“Plans”), the 60 units affordable to very low-income households to be constructed as part of this development are to be designated as available to satisfy the Agency’s Replacement Housing obligation as described in the Plans.

 

The attached fact sheets detail the financing that the sponsor is proposing. 

 

PUBLIC OUTREACH

 

No neighborhood meetings have been held, but the public will have the opportunity to speak at the noticed public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council as part of the PD Zoning approval process.

 

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The City’s deed of trust and 55-year affordability restrictions will be recorded on the property and may be subject to subordination to senior lenders as permitted by State law.

 

CEQA

 

ND

 

COORDINATION

 

The preparation of this report has been coordinated with the Office of the City Attorney.

 

REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA FINDINGS

 

The recommended project is not located within a Redevelopment Project Area.  Thus it is required that the City make a finding, on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency, that any such project which utilizes redevelopment funds is a benefit to redevelopment areas.

 

Since rental housing for very-low persons and households is identified as vital to support the City's economic growth, much of which is planned to occur in Downtown and industrial redevelopment project areas, staff recommends that the City Council find that the use of any 20% Housing Funds for the McLaughlin Avenue Senior Apartments Development to be a benefit to these redevelopment project areas.

 

COST IMPLICATIONS

 

Funding for the project is available in the Housing Department’s Fiscal Year 2000-01 Budget.

 

 

LESLYE CORSIGLIA

Acting Director of Housing

 

Attachment

 

 

 

McLaughlin Senior Apartments

Housing Development Fact Sheet

 

Development Team

 

Developer:                                            ROEM Development Corporation

Architect:                                              James Guthrie & Associates

Contractor:                                           To Be Determined

Property Manager:                                To Be Determined

 

Project Characteristics

 

Project Location:                                  1275 McLaughlin Avenue, south of Owsley Avenue

Acreage:                                               1.55 acres

Council District:                                    7

Project Type:                                        Senior rental

Group Served:                                      Very-low income households

Number of Units:                                  61 (60 very low-income, and 1 unrestricted Manager’s unit)

 

Bedroom Mix and                               

Monthly Rent:                                      

 

1 BR

2 BR

VLI (45% AMI)

27@ $700

 

VLI (50% AMI)

33 @ $782

 

Unrestricted

 

1 @ $1636

 

 

 

Other Amenities:                                   Community Room, Manager’s office and laundry facilities

 

Estimated Project Cost:                        $11,046,701

Cost per Unit:                                       $181,093

City Subsidy:                                        up to $2,450,000

City Subsidy per Unit:                           $40,833

Leverage Per Subsidized Unit:               4.43 to 1

Land Appraised Value:                         $2,710,000 (Cushman & Wakefield, April 26, 2001)

 

 

Acquisition/Predevelopment Loan Terms and Conditions

 

Acquisition/Predevelopment

  Loan Amount:                         $2,450,000

Term:                                                   24 months

Interest Rate:                                        4%, simple

Security:                                               Recorded First Deed of Trust

Repayment:                                          City Construction Loan

Loan to Value:                                      Less than 100%

Recourse:                                             The City’s Acquisition/Predevelopment loan will be recourse

Subordination:                                      As allowed by State law

Affordability Restrictions:                      55-year Affordability Restrictions for 60 of the units to be recorded on the property at the time of acquisition, and may be subordinated as permitted by State law.

 

Loan Conditions:

 

1.                  Sponsor will apply for a 9% tax credit allocation from the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee in June 2001.

 

2.                  In the event the project does not receive a tax credit allocation, the sponsor must provide an alternative financing structure that is acceptable to the Housing Department.

 

3.                  The project sponsor must obtain a building systems and structural analysis acceptable to the Housing Department.

 

4.                  Environmental clearance for potential asbestos contamination and mitigation plan must be submitted and approved by the Housing Department, prior to any demolition of existing structures.

 

5.                  Final scope of work for project construction to be reviewed and approved by the Housing Department.

 

Planning Issues

 

GP Designation:                                    High Density Residential (25-40 DU/AC)

PD Rezoning Status:                             Council to approve on May 15, 2001

PD Permit Status                                  Pending

Building Permits:                                   Pending

Relocation Needed:                              Not applicable. 

 

Toxic Issues:                                         A Phase I was completed by Purcell, Rhoades & Associates on April 25, 2001.  The consultant observed isolated oil and grease stains on the concrete slab, a hazardous waste locker that did not contain any chemical materials, a chemical locker that contained retail size containers of fuel and solvent cleaners; a 50 gallon drum that was labeled as hydraulic fluid; and smaller drums labeled as oil and grease.  There was no indication of a valve or grate at the latter location that would suggest a buried tank.  There was no indication of asbestos containing materials present within the warehouse.  No further action is recommended for this portion of the site.  The use of pesticides and/or herbicides at the site area was common for the region and there is no indication that the site would have any greater potential for contamination from their use than at other areas.  The orchard use of the site ceased at least 40 years ago.  There is a low potential for significant impact from pesticides and/or herbicides at this site and no further action is recommended.   There is the possibility of asbestos containing materials being present in the house.  Demolition contractors should be informed of the possibility of the presence of asbestos containing materials and a certified asbestos inspector should review, sample and test, as necessary to determine what level, if any, mitigation is required for proper demolition and disposal of building materials at this site.  No further studies were recommended.

 

Estimated Project Development Timeline

 

May 9, 2001                                        Planning Commission PD Zoning Hearing

 

May 15, 2001                                      Anticipated PD Zoning Approval by City Council

 

May 29, 2001                                      Anticipated City Council Approval of Business Terms for an Acquisition Loan

 

June 2001                                            Anticipated Close of Acquisition City Loan

 

June 2001                                            Application for Tax Credit Allocation

 

August 2001                                         Anticipated Announcement of Tax Credit Allocations

 

August 2001                                         Anticipated City Council Approval of Business Terms for the Construction/Permanent Loan

 

October 2001                                      Anticipated Building Permit Approval

 

October 2001                                      Anticipated Start of Construction

 

October 2002                                      Anticipated Completion of Construction