|
CITY OF SAN
JOSÉ, CALIFORNIA Department of
Planning, Building and Code Enforcement 801 North First
Street, Room 400 San José,
California 95110-1795 |
Hearing
Date/Agenda Number P.C. 9/24/03
Item: 4.c. |
||||
|
|
File Number PDC 03-022 |
||||
|
STAFF REPORT |
Application Type Planned Development Rezoning |
||||
|
|
Council District SNI
Area 3 Spartan
Keyes |
||||
|
|
Planning Area Central |
||||
|
|
Assessor's
Parcel Number(s) 472-18-051 |
||||
|
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION |
Completed by: John Davidson |
||||
|
Location: Southeast
corner of E. Virginia and S. Fifth Streets |
|||||
|
Gross Acreage: 3.9 |
Net Acreage: 3.7 |
Net Density: 46 DU/AC |
|||
|
Existing Zoning: LI Light
Industrial |
Existing Use: self-storage
warehouse |
||||
|
Proposed Zoning: A(PD)
Planned
Development |
Proposed Use: up to 170 single-family attached dwelling units with two levels of
underground parking |
||||
|
GENERAL PLAN |
Completed
by: JED |
||||
|
Land
Use/Transportation Diagram Designation Residential Support for the Core (25+ DU/AC) |
Project
Conformance: [ X]Yes [
] No [ x ] See
Analysis and Recommendations |
||||
|
SURROUNDING LAND
USES AND ZONING |
Completed
by: JED |
||||
|
North: Interstate
280 freeway exit, Single-family residences R-M
Multi-family Residence |
|||||
|
East: Warehouse, Single-family residences LI Light Industrial, R-2 Residence |
|||||
|
South: Apartments A(PD) Planned
Development |
|||||
|
West: Industrial
Uses (Dole Building) LI Light
Industrial |
|||||
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS |
Completed
by: JED |
||||
|
[ ] Environmental Impact Report certified [ X] Negative
Declaration circulated on September 4, 2003 [ ] Negative Declaration adopted on |
[ ] Exempt [ ]
Environmental Review Incomplete |
||||
|
FILE HISTORY |
Completed
by: JED |
||||
|
Annexation
Title: Original City |
Date: March 27, 1850 |
||||
|
PLANNING
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION |
|||||
|
[ X] Approval [ ] Approval with Conditions [ ] Denial |
Date: _________________________ |
Approved
by: ____________________________ [ ] Action [b ] Recommendation |
|||
|
APPLICANT/OWNER |
|||||
|
US Development Partners Attn: John Mogannam 50 W. San Fernando Street, Suite 320 San Jose, CA 95113 |
|||||
|
PUBLIC
AGENCY COMMENTS RECEIVED |
Completed
by: JED |
|
|||
|
Department of Public Works See
attached memos |
|
||||
|
Other Departments and Agencies See
attached memos from Fire Department, Police Department, VTA, and
Environmental Services Department |
|
||||
|
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE |
|
||||
|
Letter from Peter
Eakland and response from the Department of Public Works discussed in the
analysis section. |
|
||||
|
ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS |
|
|
|||
BACKGROUND
The applicant is
proposing a Planned Development Rezoning to allow up to 170 single-family
attached units with associated underground parking on a 3.9 gross acre site at
the southeast corner of E. Virginia and S. Fifth Streets. The site is located within the Spartan Keyes
Strong Neighborhood Initiative Area, and within the study area of the draft
Martha Gardens Specific Plan.
A self-storage
facility is located on the subject site, which was originally used as a
warehouse for the Dole Company. The S.
Seventh Street exit for Highway 280, along with a pocket of single-family
residences are located to the north across E. Virginia Street. A number of single-family residences, along
with a warehouse, are located to the east across S. Sixth Street. A large apartment complex is located to the
south across Martha Street. Industrial
uses are located in the Dole building, to the west across S. Fifth Street.
Project Description. The project consists of 152 three-bedroom and 18 two-bedroom
townhouses. The vast majority of the units are three-story, with two-story
units proposed along the S. Sixth Street frontage, across from existing single
family. The units are built on top of a
podium parking structure. The dwelling
unit density proposed, 46 dwelling units per acre, is approximately twice the
density of a standard townhouse project, and is comparable to a three-story
podium apartment complex.
Every unit has a
private garage inside the podium with at least one space. Residents will be able to drive their car
into their garage, and walk up an interior stair to their residence. Guest parking and additional resident
parking are located on a second level of parking in an open configuration. A
total of 427 parking spaces are provided, in conformance with Zoning Ordinance
Requirements.
The townhouse
units are typically three stories and 37 feet in height, except for the units
along S. Sixth Street, which are proposed at two stories and 30 feet in
height. Units range in area from
approximately 1,100 to 1,800 square feet in area. Each unit has a small private yard, which range in size from 130
to 260 square feet in area, depending on the width of the unit.
Units are
differentiated along the different project frontages, responding to the varied
character of the surrounding properties.
The units vary from wider, lower units along S. Sixth Street that have
single-family styling cues, to more industrial buildings along S. Fifth Street.
All of the perimeter units have porches that directly access the street. The front doors of interior units can be
accessed by pedestrian entrances at the perimeter of the site and by a network
of pathways through the development.
An Initial Study
was prepared for this project and a Negative Declaration was circulated by the
Director of Planning on September 4, 2003.
Noise is the major environmental issue.
The Initial Study included a noise report that addressed impacts to the
proposed project from noise from Highway 280. Mitigation measures identified in
that report have been incorporated into the project.
Noise Impacts. The City of San Jose Noise Element in the General Plan
utilizes the Day-Night Level (DNL) 24-hour noise descriptor to define community
noise impacts, and specifies that exterior noise exposures at residential areas
not exceed 60 dB DNL when the noise source is transportation related. In addition, interior noise exposures are
not to exceed 45 dB DNL. The Noise
Element also states that residential development in close proximity to major
thoroughfares, in the Downtown Core Area, along railroads and in the vicinity
of San Jose International Airport have noise exposures that may not be able to
meet the noise standards in the time frame of the General Plan. For these cases, staff has supported 65 dB
DNL as the near-term exterior noise standard.
The noise report
found the existing noise environment is due primarily to vehicular traffic on
Interstate 280. The analysis found
noise exposure excesses up to 71 dB DNL occur at the edges of the site and
mitigation measures will be required to reduce interior noise levels below 45 dB
DNL. Exterior spaces will be blocked
from freeway noise by the perimeter townhouses, and the resulting exterior
noise levels in recreation areas will be at or below 61 dBA DNL, which is
acceptable given the urban nature of the project.
The project proposes
thick sound-rated windows and mechanical ventilation to provide the required 45
dB DNL interior living environment.
Units within 650 feet of the southern edge of Interstate 280 will have
windows with sound transmission class (STC) ratings of between 31 and 33 to
allow the interior noise standards to be met within residences. In addition, all townhouses on the Fifth,
Sixth, and Virginia Street frontages are required to have mechanical
ventilation. By incorporating the
mitigation measures suggested in the noise report, the project will be able to
achieve exterior noise levels of 65 dB DNL across the site, including in
private open spaces, and the required interior noise levels of 45 dB DNL.
Hazardous Materials.
The proposed site is currently occupied by a non-historic warehouse
built in the 1950s for the Dole Corporation.
The building to be demolished was built in the mid-1950s and is likely
to contain lead-based paint. Demolition
of this structure could expose construction workers or other persons in the
vicinity to harmful levels of lead, which could be a significant health impact.
The Initial Study calls for a survey for lead based paint of painted surfaces
and soil around the building prior to demolition. Pursuant to state law, any
debris or soil containing lead-based paint or coatings will be disposed of at
landfills that meet acceptance criteria for the waste being disposed.
Traffic Impacts.
The Initial Study examined traffic impacts from the project, and found
that the existing signalized intersections will conform to the City’s Level of
Service (LoS) policy in the project condition.
Therefore, the project will not have significant environmental impacts
as defined by the City’s implementation of CEQA. However, the project will have operational impacts on the flow of
traffic in the neighborhood, which are discussed in the analysis section of
this report.
The proposal, at
a net density of 46 DU/AC, conforms to the General Plan Land Use Designation of
Residential Support for the Core (25+ DU/AC).
The Residential Support for the Core designation has a minimum density
requirement of 25 dwelling units per acre and no maximum density. The designation is intended to expand the
potential for residential development in close proximity to central area jobs,
and to create new consumer markets in the downtown area.
The project site
is located within the Spartan Keyes Strong Neighborhoods Area. The Spartan Keyes Strong Neighborhoods
Improvement Plan indicates that one of the goals of the plan is to support
neighborhood scale residential infill development. The proposed development is scaled to the neighborhood through
the use of two-story units along the Sixth Street frontage, and through the use
of porches and street entries along the perimeter of the project.
The project is
also located within the study area of the draft Martha Gardens Specific
Plan. The draft specific plan calls for
infill development at high densities that establishes a strong sense of
neighborhood. The project is consistent
with the proposed High Density Residential (40-70) DU/AC) designation for the
site, and establishes a strong sense of neighborhood by maintaining a human
scale and facing outwards towards surrounding properties.
The primary
project issues are compatibility with adjacent uses, traffic flow around the
site, and conformance with the Parkland Dedication Ordinance.
Compatibility with adjacent
uses. The proposed project covers an entire block,
and is surrounded by widely varying buildings and uses. The project attempts to
respond to these varying conditions through the project design. Along S. Sixth
Street, across from existing one-and-a-half story single-family residences,
buildings will be an average of 30’ and two stories in height. Along Sixth
Street, the setback from the property line to the edge of the podium is
approximately 13 feet, which is enough room for a front porch, steps down from
the first level to street level, and a small front yard. The units along the
Sixth Street frontage will be 26 feet in width, which is similar to the 30 to
35-foot widths of traditional single-family residences in the Spartan Keyes
neighborhood. Detailing of these units will be reflective of the single-family
character of that block of S. Sixth Street, and will be finalized through the
Planned Development Permit process.
Along S. Fifth
Street, the podium will also be set back to allow for steps from the unit
porches down to the street. However,
the units will be three stories and 37 feet in height, in response to the
height of the Dole building across the street. Individual units will range in
width from 13 feet to 18 feet. Units
along this frontage will be significantly boxier and more industrial in
character, in response to the older industrial building across the Street.
Units along
Virginia and Martha Streets will be set back 5 feet from the property line,
with similar building heights and unit widths to the Fifth Street
frontage. Units will be a mix of styles
along these two frontages.
By taking these
varied approaches to each frontage, the project has achieved compatibility with
the surrounding uses.
Traffic flow around the
site. Because this is an industrial area that is
in transition to residential use, and due to the project’s proximity to
Interstate 280, traffic flow around the site is a significant issue.
Driveway entrances.
Two driveway entrances to the project are proposed along S. Fifth
Street. During the review of the
project, the Department of Public Works raised concerns about the proposed
location of the driveways. Their
concern was that the existing uses along the west side of S. Fifth Street,
which include industrial uses served by large trucks would present a conflict with
the proposed driveways. The trucks park perpendicular to the Fifth Street
industrial building in order to load and unload. However, perpendicular parking is prohibited along Fifth Street,
and with Police enforcement, should cease and not present a traffic conflict
with the project.
Signalization of the I-280 off-ramp. As a part of the traffic study for the
proposed development, the traffic consultant prepared a signal warrant analysis
for two unsignalized intersections near the property: the intersection of
Virginia, Sixth, and the Interstate 280 off-ramp, and the intersection of
Seventh and Martha Streets. Signal
warrant studies analyze the need for new traffic lights at unsignalized
intersections by comparing background conditions with project conditions. At the Sixth/Virginia intersection, a
traffic signal is not warranted in the background condition, but is warranted
in the project condition. The
Department of Public Works has included signalization of the Sixth/Virginia
intersection as a project condition.
Signalizing the Sixth/Virginia intersection is contingent on approval
from Caltrans; in the event that Caltrans does not approve signalization, then
the Department of Public Works is requesting that the developer pay a partial
share of the cost of signalizing Seventh/Martha Streets. Signalization of the Seventh/Martha
intersection is warranted in both the background and project conditions.
Two-way traffic along S. Sixth Street.
Traffic along S. Sixth Street is currently one-way in the southbound
direction. If the Interstate 280 off-ramp
were signalized, S. Sixth Street between Virginia and Martha Streets would be
converted to two-way traffic, representing a benefit to the neighborhood and
the project. The Department of Public
Works has included conversion of Sixth Street to two-way traffic as a project
condition in their traffic memo, should Caltrans agree to signalization of the
off-ramp. Conversion of Sixth Street to
two-way traffic would reduce the need for residents to travel along Martha to
Seventh Street to get on Interstate 280.
In the event that the 280 off-ramp were not signalized, traffic would
remain one-way along Sixth Street.
Two-way traffic along E. Virginia Street
between Sixth and Seventh. One of the neighborhood concerns
regarding traffic is the flow of traffic on E. Virginia Street between S. Sixth
and S. Seventh Streets. Presently, traffic along E. Virginia Street is one-way
towards S. Seventh Street to the east. One resident, Peter Eakland, has
expressed concerns that the one-way condition along Virginia Street will force
project residents to travel down Seventh to Martha Street to access the site.
He has suggested to the Department of Public Works that that segment of
Virginia Street be converted to two-way traffic. The Department of Public Works
has not included conversion Virginia Street to two-way traffic as a project
condition due to queuing concerns from traffic exiting from Interstate 280 and
waiting at the Seventh/Virginia intersection.
Parks Dedication Fees.
The proposed project is not being required to dedicate land for public
open space as a part of the project.
Instead, per the Parkland Dedication Ordinance, the developer will be
required to make an in-lieu payment for the service impacts from 170 new residential
units. The in-lieu payment will be used
for acquisition, development, and/or improvement of parkland within Council
District 3.
The project
proposes 170 units on 3.7 net acres, for a density of 46 DU/AC, which is in
line with the densities anticipated under the site’s General Plan designation
of Residential Support for the Core (25+ DU/AC).
Staff is
recommending approval of the project, with conditions identified in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration and in the Department of Public Works traffic
memo, to insure that the project will have less than significant environmental
impacts and will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
A public hearing
notice for the project was published in a local newspaper and mailed to all
property owners and tenants within 1,000 feet of the subject site. A community
meeting, with staff present, was held May 19, 2003. The primary topics of
discussion were traffic from the project site and the location of the proposed
project entrances. Neighborhood residents expressed concern about the
incremental increase of traffic in the neighborhood, especially with regard to
traffic along E. Virginia Street, and at the intersections of S. Seventh and E.
Virginia, and Martha Streets. Neighbors also expressed concerns about relocating
the proposed project driveways from S. Fifth to S. Sixth Streets.
Planning staff
recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval and the
City Council approve the project for the following reasons: ‘
1. The proposed rezoning conforms to the
subject site’s General Plan Land Use Diagram Designation of Residential Support
for the Core (25+ DU/AC).
2. The project proposes a design that
activates the Fifth, Sixth, Virginia, and Martha Street frontages by providing
porches and stoops with direct access to the street.
3. The project relates appropriately to
surrounding development in terms of height, setbacks, and detailing.
4. The project proposes an innovative
solution to the problem of providing dense infill housing, by creating units
that have private garages and separate entries at a density of 46 DU/AC, almost
six times as dense as traditional single-family developments.
5. The project is consistent with the goals
of the Spartan Keyes Strong Neighborhoods Improvement Plan.
6. The project is consistent with the draft
Martha Gardens Specific Plan.
C: Donald MacDonald, Donald
MacDonald Architects, 1516 Folsom Street, Suite B, San Francisco, CA, 94103