
MAKING GOVERNMENT WORK
BETTER COMMITTEE
Meeting Report
October 8, 2003
PRESENT: Chair Nora Campos, Councilmember Chuck
Reed, Councilmember Linda J. Le Zotte
ABSENT: Councilmember David Cortese
STAFF: Kay Winer, Danielle Kenealey, Meghan
Horrigan, Jerry Silva, Sharon Landers, Helen Duong, David Baum, Laurel
Prevetti, Theresa Hayes, Wandzia Grycz, Sara Hensley, Cecil Lawson, Cameron
Smith, Dave Bopf, Dan Kadomoto, Michael Ho, Carl Mosher, Joe Horwedel, Peter
Jensen, Larry Lisenbee, Scott Johnson, Mike Ryder, Mark Burton, Jose Garcia, Adonna
Amoroso
The
meeting was convened at 2:30 PM
a. Follow-up on Review of Effectiveness of Current City and RDA Community Outreach and Accessibility (City/Agency – Report was initially presented at the 4/9/03 MGWB Committee)
Sharon
Landers, Assistant Executive Director, Redevelopment Agency gave an overview of
the report. She talked about the City’s
communication challenges and stated that the two largest ethnic groups in San
José are Hispanic and Vietnamese.
According to study results, the Hispanic population tends to get more of
their information from radio and television while the Vietnamese population
prefers written material. She noted
that staff is still cognizant of the needs of other ethnic groups within the
City.
Helen
Duong, Communications Assistant, Redevelopment Agency added that in 2002, the
Agency took a more active approach to Outreach efforts in the community. She used two events as an example: The
Fiesta de Navidad and the Soccer event.
Because these events were successful, business associations decided to
develop their own marketing events (utilizing the Agency’s support and
cooperation). Next year, the Agency
will be promoting the first Tamale Festival.
The area is getting more community oriented as a result of these
efforts.
Helen
stated that, within the Vietnamese Community, implementation of the Strong
Neighborhoods Initiative (SNI) caused some confusion. The Agency responded by providing services that encouraged
cross-community participation and collaboration. At this point, staff is working one-on-one with a representative
from the Vietnamese Community to provide written material and it is working
well.
Sharon
gave an overview of the Agency’s Communication Plan Initiatives. She stated that staff has identified who the
various partners and stakeholders are now.
Laurel
Prevetti, Deputy Director, Planning, Building and Code Enforcement talked about
the Citywide Public Outreach Policy, which was adopted in 1999. She stated that since January 2003, Planning
staff has been working with a subcommittee of the SNI Project Area Committee to
identify potential revisions. She gave
an overview of the key proposed revisions and the schedule for implementation.
Sharon
added that City and Agency staff are sensitive to improving communication needs
within the community and are also working at keeping costs low by utilizing
existing resources.
Councilmember
Reed stated that the General Plan meetings have consistently been the least
attended by the community. Since many
important decisions, impacting the City’s communities, are made at these
meetings, he would like to see attendance improved. He asked if this issue is being addressed.
Laurel
responded that staff recognizes the need to be more proactive in getting the
word out and the revisions to the Public Outreach Policy will also apply to the
General Plan meetings.
Councilmember
Reed noted that, in his district, there is a unique community organization and
e-mail works best when communicating with them.
Kay
Winer, Deputy City Manager suggested that staff talk with each Council District
in order to obtain suggestions and ideas for communicating with the diverse
neighborhood associations. She also
added that the outreach policy could have broader citywide application.
Councilmember
Le Zotte added that the Councilmembers could also provide information on the
various ethnic groups that populate each district.
Theresa
Hayes, Marketing and Communications Officer, Housing Department added that
staff in the Housing Department could also be used as a resource.
Chair
Campos asked for a description of the Communication Team.
Sharon
replied that the Communication Team consisted of three people but that the
entire Agency workforce is used as a resource.
Chair
Campos asked what the timeline is for the revised Public Outreach Policy.
Sharon
answered that the timeline is included in the review but that staff can come
back at the end of the fiscal year with an update. When an update is provided, Tom Manheim, Public Outreach Manager
in the City Manager’s Office, will also participate for a citywide discussion
and presentation of ideas.
Chair
Campos suggested that a breakdown of the percentages of people who prefer
radio, TV and written information be included in the update.
Upon motion of Councilmember
Reed, seconded by Councilmember Le Zotte, the Committee accepted the staff
report and requested that staff return with an update on the Citywide Public
Outreach Policy at the end of the fiscal year.
b. IT Major
Projects Update (Information Technology)
Wandzia
Grycz, Chief Information Office, Information Technology Department gave an
introduction to the report. She stated
that there are eight different projects covered in the report and that the
project manager from each project would give a brief update.
Class
Registration and Payments On-line (e-Government Project)
Sara
Hensley, Director, Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services (PRNS) gave an
update. She stated that the project is
moving right along. The project manager
has been working with PRNS staff to analyze internal work, particularly in the
area of process improvements. Before
going out to bid staff is evaluating the current process to determine what
works and also what improvements can be made.
The project charter has been completed and there are two groups, one
made up of Department Heads and the other consisting of Senior Manager’s from
three different departments that will work on citywide logistics. Staff has been working on the business
processes and are making “quick-fixes” where they can, since it will take some
time to get a more permanent system in place.
The infrastructure also needs to be in place before the new system can
be installed.
Automated
Information System/Automated Reporting System
Cecil
Lawson, CIO, Police Department gave an update.
He stated that 220 out of 436 cars now have the in-car computer (MDC)
systems installed. About 3 cars are
completed per day. Communicating
wireless reports will be done through software, which should be deployed in a
couple of weeks (as scheduled).
Interfacing with the existing system is also running on schedule.
Computer
Aided Dispatch/Automatic Vehicle Location Project
Cameron
Smith, Communications Manager, Police Department gave an updated. He stated that the project is going well
with a few milestones reached ahead of schedule. The first training session is scheduled for this weekend. He added that there have been no major
problems since the switch to a commercial, off-the-shelf software program.
San
José Permits On-line
Dave
Bopf, Project Manager, Planning, Building and Code Enforcement gave an
update. He stated that 1,300 permits
have been issued since the program launch and it is now possible to search for
status and permit activity. Staff has
received positive feedback from the public and is hoping to begin a public
outreach campaign in a couple of weeks.
Eventually the system will allow customers to request inspections online. The department currently receives 500 to 800
requests per day. Having the option of
requesting inspections online would mean the ability to redeploy two employees,
who currently answer phones, to other areas of the department.
Councilmember
Reed asked what percentage of the permits are now issued on-line.
Dave
answered that the 1, 300 permits is a little less than 10% of the volume. The department is still accepting mail-in
and walk-in applications. It is
estimated that 20-30% will eventually be done on-line.
Integrated
Human Resource/Payroll System
Dan
Kadomoto, Business Systems Manager, Finance Department gave an update. He stated that in early May 2003, the
Executive Steering Committee approved moving forward with the Electronic Time
Capture project. This is not yet
implemented but staff is moving forward.
Councilmember
Reed asked what impact the J.D. Edwards acquisition (of PeopleSoft) would have
on the project.
Dan
replied that there will be some impact but how much is not yet known.
Wandzia
added that the merger would probably affect the upgrades somewhat.
CIP
Database Enhancement Project Phase I
Michael
Ho, Assistant to the Director, Public Works gave an update. He stated that the CIP database was
successfully migrated to the Oracle platform last year. The CIP Database enhancement master plan was
completed in April. Due to recent
budget constraints, it will be implemented in-house utilizing existing staff
resources. Phase II of the Enhancement
Project is in progress. One new feature
is the posting of solicitations for consulting services on the Internet. Consultants may also subscribe to the
hotline and receive e-mail notifications of any posting on the website. The Database team is currently working on
linking the CIP Database to the City’s FMS system. Upon completion, budget information may be downloaded to the
project level. CIP project owner and
project staff will be able to monitor project budget and expenditures online.
Customer
Relationship Management, Utility Billing System, Partner Relationship
Management
Carl
Mosher, Director, Environmental Services gave an update. He stated that two major milestones have
been completed: The Council approved the RFP and twelve proposals have been
received. The next step is for the
vendors to provide another demonstration.
Recommendations will go to Council in November. He added that the next CUSP Status report
(included in the next quarterly IT Status Report) will focus on implementation.
Geographic
Information System Integration Plan
Joe
Horwedel, Deputy Director, Planning, Building and Code Enforcement gave an
update. He stated that the project
experienced a few setbacks when a couple of staff left the City but a
consulting firm has been brought on board.
The project is moving forward now.
Upon motion of Councilmember
Reed, seconded by Councilmember Le Zotte, the Committee accepted the staff
report.
c.
Auditor’s Recommendations Follow-up report for Six Months
Ended June 30, 2003 (Auditor)
Jerry
Silva, City Auditor gave an overview of the status report. He stated that during the semi-annual period
covering January 1 through June 30, 2003, there were 105 outstanding
recommendations. 22 recommendations
were implemented, 67 recommendations were partly implemented and 16 were
not. He added that, as of June 30,
2003, there are 83 recommendations which remain open. Of these, 2 recommendations are Priority 1. Of the sixteen recommendations which were
not implemented, 1 recommendation was Priority 1.
Councilmember
Reed asked if the Fire Department would submit a report regarding the
non-implemented Hazardous Materials Storage recommendation (Priority 1).
Larry
Lisenbee, Budget Director, City Manager’s Office replied that the Budget Office
will be provide the Fire Department with some assistance to complete an updated
analyses for consideration in the upcoming budget process.
Councilmember
Le Zotte asked what work has been done to update the 1993 revenue figures.
Larry
replied that the real problem is developing a fee schedule.
Peter
Jensen, Assistant to the City Manager added that an Urban Management Fellow
would be rotated in to help with this project.
Upon motion of Councilmember
Reed, seconded by Councilmember Le Zotte, the Committee accepted the staff
report.
d. City Clerk One-Stop Shop follow-up report
The Committee deferred this
item to the November 12 Making Government Work Better Committee.
e. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) (Finance)
Scott
Johnson, Director, Finance Department acknowledged the hard work of the staff
involved and gave an overview of the CAFR report.
Mark
Burton, Deputy Director, Finance Department gave an overview of the Goals and
Accomplishments, the CAFR Submission/Completion Dates and the new GASB 34
Reporting Model.
Scott
then gave an overview of the document itself.
He stated that the language is geared towards the general public. He noted that the Auditor (Macias, Gini
& Company) has given the City of San José a “clean” opinion which is the
highest rating they can give. He ended
his presentation with a brief comment of Financial Barometers including the
City’s financial condition and financial position.
Cindy
Pong, Macias, Gini and Company, gave a brief presentation which covered the
Scope of Services of financial audits and other audit services, the result of
the CAFR Audit (an unqualified or “Clean” Opinion was issued) and Reporting
Changes. She stated that the changes
were minimal this year.
Councilmember
Reed asked why there was a difference between the CAFR Report figures and the
General Fund Annual Report (which is going to Council next week).
Scott
replied that there is a chart in the CAFR, which shows the difference. He added that staff would provide a written
explanation next week.
Councilmember
Reed asked what the weaknesses are in the GASB 34 New system.
Jerry
answered that the problems are really in the private sector not the government
sector. He added that a risk assessment
pertinent to the City’s financial system has not been done but he does know
that testing is done on internal controls.
Councilmember
Reed asked if the Agency was aware of the fiber optics development item that is
listed under “Non-Governmental Funds”.
Scott
replied that staff would follow-up on this issue.
Councilmember
Reed asked if staff has done a calculation of the cost associated to a possible
bond-rating drop.
Scott
answered yes, staff has done this and will provide this information.
David
Baum, Director, Redevelopment Agency stated that the Agency prepares its own
CAFR report which is a culmination of financial statements that the agency
gives to the Board all year long. He
added that staff is still working on the Agency CAFR and is currently waiting
for the Auditor’s opinion. He noted
that the Agency’s information is summarized in the City’s CAFR.
Upon motion of Councilmember
Le Zotte, seconded by Councilmember Reed, the Committee accepted the staff
report.
f. School Crossing Guard Program Audit Report (Auditor)
Jerry
Silva gave some background information on the audit. He stated that the audit has started and stopped several
times. Last June the audit began again. The memo presented to the Committee is not
an audit but rather identifies the budget associated with the program.
Chair
Campos stated that she is an advocate for crossing guards and has called the
Police Department several times about the need for more. She is frustrated because Police personnel
told her that there was no funding for crossing guards. She has since learned that this is not the
case.
Adonna
Amoroso, Deputy Chief, Police Department replied that there are really two
reasons why additional crossing guards have not been placed. The first is that the number of crossing
guards placed at intersections is based on specific, qualifying criteria and
that crossing guards have been placed at all intersections meeting these criteria. The second reason is that the funding that
is allocated to the Crossing Guard Program has been used for the Hire Ahead
Program, which does not have sufficient funding. She added that the Hire Ahead Program is also a Council priority.
Councilmember
Le Zotte stated that, although she agrees that both programs are a high
priority, it is really the Council’s role to make policy decisions. She requested that the Auditor includes an
analysis of the current criteria for intersections qualifying for crossing
guards. There may be a need to revise
the criteria, since they were established back in the 1970’s and reviewed
periodically.
Upon motion of Councilmember
Le Zotte, seconded by Councilmember Reed, the Committee accepted the staff
report with the direction that the Auditor includes an analysis of the current
criteria for intersections qualifying for crossing guards.
g. Oral Petitions
None
h. Adjournment
The Committee was adjourned at 5:10 P.M.
Councilmember
Nora Campos, Chair,
Making
Government Work Better Committee