Subject:  HAPPY HOLLOW PARK & ZOO INTERIM INFRASTRUCTURE          IMPROVEMENTS

 

COUNCIL DISTRICT:  Citywide

SNI AREA:      Tully / Senter

 

REASON FOR ADDENDUM

 

To allow start of construction at the earliest possible time in order to complete construction prior to the start of the 2002 high attendance period, which begins in May.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

Report on bids and award of contract for the Happy Hollow Park & Zoo Interim Infrastructure Improvements to the low bidder, HRB Construction, Inc., to include the base bid and Add Alternate Nos. 1 and 2 in the amount of $518,205, and approval of a contingency in the amount of $78,000.   CEQA:  Resolution No.66098.

 

BACKGROUND

 

Happy Hollow Park & Zoo (HHP&Z), the City of San Jose’s José’s children amusement park and animal zoo, located in Kelley Park, requires infrastructure improvements after 30 years of limited capital improvements.  In June 1995, the City Council adopted a master plan for the Happy Hollow Park & Zoo that identified an initial phase to upgrade the park infrastructure to meet current and future demands.

 

In March 1998, the City retained a consultant, Kennedy/Jenks-Civil Engineers, to assess the existing utilitiesy and service support facilities and determine the feasibility of infrastructure upgrades.  The study revealed a significant deterioration of the site utility infrastructure due to age and deferred maintenance. and   Tthe consultant recommended system upgrades based on the following priorities:  (1) code and regulations upgrades, (2) satisfaction of current service demands, and (3) infrastructure development matching master plan build-out. 

 

Given the limited funding that was allocated for the infrastructure project, the City decided proceeded to pursue priority one improvements required for code and regulation complianceplus limited improvements.  In November 1999, the City engaged the consultant to provide utilities mapping, design development, and construction documents and estimates for that purpose and for the installation of a new children’s amusement ride.  Cost estimates from the design development plan indicated the amusement ride installation was greater than the budget for that element, and it was deferred into the future.

 

During utility mapping, the consultant discovered significant utility deterioration beyond the previously known conditions.  This was due to facility age, deferred maintenance, and incomplete as-built site utility maps.  In May 2000, the City Council approved an amendment to the consultant’s agreement to include additional utility investigation and specific recommendations for repair or replacement.

 

Concurrent with and in response to the consultant’s work, City staff from a number of departments provided labor and materials for some necessary maintenance operations, funded by the project budget.  The work included storm and sewer lines inspection and repairs, minor tree removal, pond renovation, an emergency generator, electrical repairs, a security alarm system, and various amusement ride repairs.  Subsequent to the park maintenance work, the electrical service to the site was upgraded to adequately serve future exhibits and structures at Happy Hollow Park and & Zoo. This improvement was also funded by the project budget.  These various improvements saved considerable time and money for required interim improvements and, like the proposed code upgrades, are useful for the upcoming implementation of the master plan for the site.

 

Project development costs associated with utility mapping, feasibility studies, and design development are applicable to the current interim infrastructure improvement project and to future infrastructure improvements that will be part of the build-out of the Happy Hollow Park & Zoo master plan. This substantial effort is the foundation for that future park expansion and development which will be carried out as part of the Parks Bond program that was approved by voters in November 2000.

 

The scope of work for the proposed project implements essential certain code complianceupgrades, utility corrective repairs/replacement, and necessary park maintenance work related to park health, safety, and welfare. These corrective measures bring the facility into current code compliance and meet current park demands.  The park, a City revenue- generating facility, will remain open during the construction period and specific measures are in place to einsure public safety, animal welfare, and expedite construction activities.

 

In addition to the base bid scope of work, there are two Add Alternate bid items which include the following:

 

Add Alt. No. 1:

Install irrigation electrical conduit, pull rope and pull boxes. 

To be awarded

Add Alt. No. 2:

Install backflow preventers at the Kid’s Cafe.

To be awarded

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANALYSIS

 

Bids were received on September 27, 2001 with the following results:

 

 

 

Contractor

 

 

Base Bid

 

Add Alt Total

 

 

Total Bid

 

Variance Amount

Over/

(Under)

Percent

 

GradeTech, Inc

   (Danville)

$558,800

$100,000

$658,800

$82,300

14%

MCH General Engineering Contractors

   (San JoseJosé)

517,570

68,500

586,070

9,570

1.6%

Engineer’s Estimate

 

491,500

85,000

576,500

----

----

HRB Construction, Inc.

   (San JoséJose)

477,205

41,000

518,205

58,295

(10%)

 

 

Contractor

Add Alt

No. 1

Add Alt

No. 2
 

GradeTech, Inc.

80,000

20,000

 

MCH General Engineering

Contractor

62,500

6,000

 

Engineer’s Estimate

60,000

25,000

 

HRB Construction, Inc.

32,000

9,000

 

 

The low bid, submitted by HRB Construction, Inc. in the amount of $518,205, is 10 percent below the Engineer's Estimate.  The bid is considered reasonable for the work involved in the proposed project.

 

A 15 percent contingency in the amount of $78,000 is requested for any unforeseen conditions which may arise during construction of this project.

 

PUBLIC OUTREACH

 

The Department of Public Works listed the proposed project on the City’s Internet bid line and advertised in the San José Jose Mercury News and San José Jose Post Record. Bid packages are routinely released to a standard list of contractor organizations, builder’s exchanges and disadvantaged business organizations, including United Minority Business Enterprises and the San José Jose Minority Business Development Center. 

 

COORDINATION

 

The Department of Public Works coordinated the proposed project with the City Attorney, Risk Manager, Equality Assurance, and the Departments of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, and Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services.

 

COST IMPLICATIONS

 

1.      COST OF RECOMMENDATION:       $518,205

 

2.            COST OF PROJECT:

 

Construction

 

$518,205

 

Consultant Fees

 

193,000

*

Design Management

 

40,000

*

Construction Management

 

75,000

 

Contingency  Budget

   (15% of Interim Infrastructure construction cost)

 

   78,000

 

 

TOTAL

 

$904,205

 

 

Note: Project development work for the Happy Hollow Park & Zoo site was completed in advance of this project with funds appropriated in prior years. 

* Consultant fees and design management costs were expended in FY1999-00 and FY2000-01

 

3.      SOURCE OF FUNDING:    391 - Construction and Conveyance Tax Fund

                                                      Park funding Citywide

 

4.      ESTIMATED START DATE OF CONSTRUCTION:  October 2001

 

5.      ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION:  April 2002

 

BUDGET REFERENCE

 

Fund:

391

Appn:

5031

RC:

054003

Amount:

$581,000

Budget Document:

FY 2001-02 Appropriation Ordinance, Section 12.12, Item 2 (w).

 

 

 

Fund:

391

Appn:

4060

RC:

107053

Amount:

$230,000

Budget Document:

FY 2001-02 Appropriation Ordinance, Section 12.12, Item 2 (v).

 

 

 

NONDISCRIMINATION

 

This project includes the City of San José Jose Nondiscrimination Requirements required by Chapter 4.08 of the San José Jose Municipal Code. 

 

CEQA

 

Resolution No. 66098,  June 27, 1995.

 

 

RAJEEV BATRA

Acting Director, Public Works Department