To:   HONORABLE MAYOR AND                   From:   Jose Obregon

                        CITY COUNCIL

 

   Subject:   SEE BELOW                                              Date:   November 10, 2003

 

 

SUBJECT:     AGREEMENT(S) FOR NATURAL GAS WITH PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (PG&E)

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

Adoption of a resolution authorizing the Director of General Services to:

 

a)      Review natural gas prices and availability on an ongoing basis;

 

b)      Assess the feasibility of purchasing natural gas from alternate sources, and

 

c)      Execute agreements with Pacific Gas and Electric for the purchase of natural gas in support of facilities and operations throughout the City; without further Council approval other than the appropriation of funds.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

Prior to 1997, California’s natural gas supply was limited to PG&E, and the subject to California Public Utility Commission regulated prices.  The gas industry was restructured and deregulated in 1997, allowing customers the ability to purchase natural gas from alternate sources called gas service providers (GSP’s).  If a GSP provided the natural gas, the local utility (PG&E for this area) was responsible for transportation of the gas across its distribution system to the customer’s meter. If the gas is provided by the local utility (PG&E), the utility must charge the market price. The market price for gas fluctuates from month-to-month, and the utility is not allowed any additional mark-up or profit.

 

Since deregulation in 1997, the City has experimented with purchasing gas from independent GSP’s to benefit from the possible cost savings due to competition in the deregulated environment. However, these pilots have not been successful. For example, several years ago the City entered into an Agreement with POCO petroleum, a GSP that guaranteed prices at 10% less than PG&E.  POCO was not successful and went out of business.   While under contract with POCO, there were supply issues as well as issues over accurate invoicing.  Currently, all of the natural gas that the City purchases is from PG&E.

 

 

ANALYSIS

 

Recognizing that deregulation has created a competitive environment and that new and more reliable GSP’s may enter the market, General Services recommends that it be authorized to periodically monitor the prices and assess the viability of contracting with new suppliers.  If the Director determines that the City should purchase natural gas from suppliers other than PG&E in an amount in excess of $100,000, the contracts will be brought to Council for approval.

 

Based on a recent review of the current availability and pricing of natural gas from available suppliers, General Services recommends that PG&E be maintained as the current natural gas supplier.  As such PG&E will provide natural gas to various City facilities, including the new Airport CNG Fueling Station and the Water Pollution Treatment Plant.

 

 

PUBLIC OUTREACH

 

N/A

 

 

COORDINATION

 

This memo has been coordinated with the City Attorney’s Office, City Manager’s Budget Office, Airport Department and the Environmental Services Department.

 

This recommendation has been place on the Treatment Plant Advisory Committee (TPAC) agenda of November 13, 2003, under the Information heading.  No TPAC action is required at this time.

 

 

COST IMPLICATIONS

 

This action is consistent with the Council approved Budget Strategy Memo; General Principles Item #2, “We must focus on protecting our vital core city services”.

 

 

BUDGET REFERENCE

 

City wide – various 2003-2004 proposed Department budgets

 

CEQA

 

Not a project

 

 

JOSE OBREGON

Director, General Services Department