SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
SECOND QUARTER MONITORING REPORT FOR THE 2002-2003 PROGRAM YEAR AND ADOPTION OF
APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUND
SNI Area: City Wide
1.
Accept this
second quarter report summarizing the status of CDBG projects and recommending
corrective actions.
2.
Approval of
an extension of the funding term for six months, from June 30, 2003 to December
31, 2003, for the following projects:
·
G13
Northside Community Center Expansion - Filipino-American Senior Opportunity
Development Council, Inc.;
·
F87
Disabled Housing Preservation – Housing for Independent People, Inc.,
·
F89 Nursery
Renovation Project – San Jose Day Nursery; and
·
F90
Franklin-McKinley School District Child Care - Franklin-McKinley School District.
3. Approval of an extension of the funding
term for one year, from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2003, for the
following project:
·
G43
Roosevelt Roller Hockey Rink Renovation project – Parks, Recreation and
Neighborhood Services Department.
4. Approval of the return of CDBG funds for
the following project:
·
F91 Zoe-27
South 11th Street – Alliance for Community Care ($403,698).
5. Adoption of
amendments to the Appropriation Ordinance in the Community Development Block
Grant Fund to do the following:
a.
Decrease the appropriation to Zoe-27th South 11th
Street by $403,698
b.
Increase the Ending Fund Balance by $403,698.
On a semi-annual
basis, a monitoring report is prepared on the projects provided by
Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) and City Departments supported by CDBG
funds, and for certain human services projects supported by the General
Fund. The report includes projects
funded in 2002-2003 and other projects carried over from years prior to
2002-2003. This report was reviewed and
approved for recommendation to the City Council by the CDBG Steering Committee
on February 24, 2003.
This report and
its attachments provide the status of all CDBG funded projects and certain
human services projects funded from the General Fund. Attachment A highlights the performance of 44 public service
projects in six categories: senior services, youth services, childcare,
services for persons with disabilities, homeless/emergency
assistance/employment and legal services.
A description of services provided and outcomes achieved is
included. Attachment A also describes
the accomplishments of 67 Community Development Improvement programs in six
categories: housing improvement program, program administration and planning, code
enforcement, economic development, fair housing and physical improvements.
A total of 111
projects are included in the 2002-2003 Second Quarter Monitoring Report. Of these, 88 (or 80%) met, substantially
met, or exceeded their goals and 23 had outstanding issues. Attachment C identifies those projects that
have met, substantially met, or exceeded their goals, as well as those with
outstanding performance issues.
For projects with performance issues, Attachment B provides a narrative that includes steps the project sponsor took to improve performance and recommended corrective actions where appropriate. CDBG staff is working with project sponsors to resolve deficiencies. In order to complete five projects mentioned in the recommendation section of this memo, approval to transfer funds or extend the funding term is requested. Funding is being returned for two projects.
ANALYSIS
The two
categories of CDBG projects are the Contractual Community Services and the
Community Development Improvement projects.
Project performance is evaluated slightly differently for these
categories as their goals and contractual obligations are different.
Contractual Community Services (CCS) or
Public Service Program
The 2002-2003
Second Quarter Monitoring Report contains information related to 44 CCS projects. Of these programs, 40 met, substantially
met, or exceeded their goals and four have performance issues requiring
discussion. Goals are considered
substantially met if agencies meet approximately 90% of their numeric goals and
submitted outcome measures. All Public
Service agencies were contractually required to submit results of outcome
measures and a report analyzing those results.
Community Development Improvement (CDI)
Program
The Community
Development Improvement Program is comprised of construction and various
“non-construction” (or non-physical improvement) projects. The CDI category funds a total of 67
projects, 48 of which (or 72%) have met, substantially met, or exceeded their
goals and 19 have outstanding issues.
The construction projects are considered as having met their goals if
the construction time-line is on-schedule.
In some cases if the time-line was revised, a project is considered
having substantially met its goals if it is back on target.
The projects
that are recommended for extension are listed in the Recommendation Section of
this memo and are also identified in Attachment B (Projects with Outstanding
Issues) and Attachment C (Monitoring Chart).
All CDI projects recommended for extension are discussed in the Projects
with Outstanding Issues section of this report. One project, G43 Roosevelt Roller Hockey Rink Renovation, is
requested to be extended retroactively from December 31, 2002 to December 31,
2003. All requests for funding
extensions are made through the CDBG Steering Committee. However, the Committee did not meet until
January 2003, after the funding term for this project has expired.
CDBG funds for
the rehabilitation of the residential care facility located on Zoe-27th
South 11th Street are being returned because the property owner of
the facility decided not to proceed with the project.
Funding for two
related projects, F71 East San Jose Community Law Center Building and F80 East
San Jose Multi-Service Center Project are being combined to allow for the construction
and/or rehabilitation of 960 Remillard
Court to be used as a multi-service center providing community, health, and
economic development services to low-income San Jose residents. These actions are included in the City
Council agenda for April 8, 2003.
This report was
coordinated with all funded agencies, including City Departments. The CDBG office used status reports provided
by the agencies in preparing this report.
This report was also considered and approved by the CDBG Steering
Committee in a meeting open to the public.
This memorandum
has been coordinated with the Budget Office and the City Attorney’s Office.
There is no cost
implication to the General Fund. Projects are funded by Community Development
Block Grant funds (Fund 441).
Not a project.
LARRY
D. LISENBEE
Budget
Director
SARA L. HENSLEY
Director of Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services