COUNCIL
AGENDA: 5-2-00
ITEM:
Memorandum
To: HONORABLE MAYOR From: Ralph A. Qualls, Jr.
AND CITY COUNCIL
Subject: SEE BELOWWATSON PARK SOCCER
BOWL Date: April 12, 2000
IRRIGATION RENOVATION
Approved Date:
COUNCIL
DISTRICT: 3, 7, 8
SUBJECT
MMedianEDIAN
IslandSLAND
ImprovementMPROVEMENTSs – PhaseHASE
4 (KeyesEYES
StreetTREET,
SenterENTER
To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND From: Rajeev Batralph A. Qualls, Jr.
CITY
COUNCIL
Subject: ROUTE 87 / BRANHAM LANETUERS-CAPITOL GOLF COURSESEE BELOW Date: 054-3012-56-12292320-010
OVERCROSSING LANDSCAPE
AND TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
Approved Date
---------------------DRAFT - 6/19/00----------------------
COUNCIL
DISTRICTS: 3, 7, 8
SUBJECTREASON FOR ADDENDUM
To expedite the award of the contract allowing
construction to start in at the earliest opportunity during the dry summer season.TUERS-CAPITOL GOLF COURSEMEDIAN ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS –
PHASE 4 RE-BID
(KEYES STREET, SENTER
RoadOAD andAND WhiteHITE RoadOAD)
RECOMMENDATION
Report
on bids and award of contract for the Watson Park Soccer Bowl Irrigation
Renovation project to the low bidder, Boulder Rock Landscape Construction in
the amount of $129,540, and approval of a contingency in the amount of $8,000.
CEQA: Exempt
Report
on bids and andauthorization for the City Manager to award approvala contract to reject all
bidsbids and
award of contract for the Median
Island Improvements – Phase 4 Re-Bid pPproject to the
low bidder and approval of Tuers-Capitol
Golf Course to the lowest responsive bidder, Granite Construction, Inc., for the base bid in
the amount of $14,104,600 and a contingency in the amount of $750,000. The award of
the contract will be subject to the
availability of proceeds from the sale of
bonds.. a ten
percent contingency.
CEQA: E.I.R.xempt.
BACKGROUND
On May 30, 2000, the City Council approved the
Master Plan for the Tuers-Capitol Golf Course, upheld the certification of the
Environmental Impact Report, and approved bond financing for the construction
of the golf course.
The subject project would construct the approved
golf course.
The site
for the proposed Tuers-Capitol Golf Course, formerly referred to as Coyote
Creek Golf Course, has been the subject of a variety of planning and design
efforts over the past 20 years. These
efforts have focused on the development of an 18-hole public golf course
facility. The subject project proposes
to develop such a course, to serve San Jose residents as well as the regional
population and visitors to the San Jose area.
Over the years of planning, the project and
site have been informally referred to as the Coyote Creek Golf Course. As design of the project progressed, the
working name of the project was changed to Tuers-Capitol Golf Course, based on
its street location. The name change avoids preconceptions about the final name
of the proposed facility and also avoids confusion of this project with a
private golf course facility in the region.
In an
effort to meet the demand for golf course facilities, the proposed 18-hole
public golf course will add to the City’s inventory of recreational facilities,
with the objective that it be affordable, serve a wide range of golf skills and
ability, and become financially self sustaining as soon as possible. The project under consideration was
initiated by City Council and has had continuing oversight and review by either
City Council or a three-member City Council Golf Facilities Task Force.
The
proposed site for development is the 180 acres that is bounded by Tuers Road on
the east, Capitol Expressway on the south, Lone Bluff Way on the west, and to
the north by a Pacific Gas & Electric Company substation and Stonegate
Park. The site is bordered on its east
and west boundaries by residential neighborhoods. An outstanding feature of the site is Coyote Creek, which bisects
it, running south to north. The creek sits within a substantial riparian corridor
consisting of dense, indigenous vegetation, which serves as habitat for a
variety of wildlife. This segment of Coyote Creek is within the Coyote Creek
Park Chain, which continues both to the north and to the south of the subject
site.
The project
site is comprised of land owned by the City of San Jose. Of the total acreage
of the site, approximately 80 acres (44%) is considered riparian corridor or
riparian corridor setback and is restricted from development under the City’s
Riparian Corridor Policy. The golf course project is proposed to be developed
on the remaining 100 acres, which is just adequate for such a facility.
In January
1997, the City began preparing a Conceptual Plan for a golf course on this
site. That plan was approved by City
Council in December 1997, along with the Market and Financial Analysis for the
proposed project. In January 1998, the
City Council authorized the initial funding to complete an environmental impact
report (EIR), a master plan, and further develop the design for preparation of
construction documents.
The EIR and
the master plan for the proposed Tuers-Capitol Golf Course were prepared
concurrently with the final construction documents. The project has been designed to address procedures and
requirements for development adjacent to the creek, addressing all
environmental concerns associated with the development of the golf course. Certification of the EIR for this project,
by the Planning Commission, occurred on April 25, 2000 and was presented to the Parks and
Recreation Commission on May 10,
2000. The action taken by the Parks and
Recreation Commission was a recommendation to approve the Tuers-Capitol
Golf Course Master Plan. The City Council approved the Environmental Impact Report for this project, the Master Plan, and the
Financing Report for the Project on
May 30,
2000.
The
proposed golf course project will construct the following facilities:
1.Golf Course: 18-hole
Par 68, 5,515-yard in length that includes
nine - Par
3, four - Par 4, five - Par 5 holes; a cart path links all tees and greens.
1.Practice
Facilities: a putting
green and a lighted two-tier driving range with 53 tee stations and a training
room;
1.Clubhouse: with a
pro shop, a kitchen with setup for catering services, indoor/outdoor dining and
event space, and provisions for bar service;
1.Parking Lot
and Operational Facilities: including
151 vehicle spaces and 20 temporary event spaces.
The 18-hole
golf course routing splits the holes between the east and west sides of Coyote
Creek. Eleven of the holes are on the
east side of the creek and seven are on the west side. A single bridge crossing the creek will be
traversed back and forth twice, once each for the front nine and the back nine
holes. The course is designed with the
Numbers “1” and “10” tees and the Numbers “9” and “18” greens adjacent to the
clubhouse.
The scope
of work for the construction of this project includes: site preparation and
demolition, erosion control, fencing, grading, storm and sanitary drainage,
bridge construction, asphalt-concrete work, concrete work, irrigation,
planting, site lighting and electrical work, utility relocations and
modifications, architectural structures, lake and stream water construction,
public art, and site signage and furniture.
COUNCIL
DISTRICT: 10
RECOMMENDATION
Report on bids and award of contract for the
construction of the Route 87 at Branham Lane Overcrossing Trail and Landscape
Improvements Pproject to the low bidder, Bellicitti &
Pellicciotti Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $112,485, and approval of a contingency
in the amount of $5,000 and approval of a $5,000 contingency.
CEQA: Exempt.
BACKGROUND
In 1990, Caltrans completed
construction of Route 87 between Santa Teresa Boulevard, to the south, and RouteState Highway 280 to the north. As part of this project, local streets,
which previously crossed the state right-of-way at level grade, were re-routed
over or under the freeway. One of the
local streets that was constructed over Route 87 was Branham Lane (map attached). The construction of this
overpass produced significant elevation differences between the travel way
along the overcrossing with surrounding residential property.
In the southeastern quadrant
of the Branham Lane Overcrossing of Route 87, the impacts of the elevation
difference are most pronounced. When
traveling or walking eastbound on Branham Lane after crossing Route 87, one can
view down into residential backyards and both first and second story
windows. The adjacent homeowners have
reported a loss of privacy.
The scope of work for this
project consists of the installation of a double row of trees that will screen
the view from the Branham Lane Overcrossing frominto the adjacent residential
properties. The treesplanting shall
consists of a single row of trees at the top of the embankment; adjacent to the sidewalk,
followed by a taller growing evergreen tree located directly behind the first
row of trees. This project also
includes the installation of a bicycle trail located at the base of the slope,
connecting the existing bicycle trail along Route 87 with Narvaez Avenue, and
the rerouting of a concrete drainage gutter.
All plant material will receive an automatic
irrigation system and a 60-day maintenance period. The City will maintain the project site after
completion of the contract
maintenance
period.
This project will be constructed pursuant to an
An
encroachment
permit is pending approval from the State of California for construction of this projectas it is located within the State right-of-way.
ANALYSIS
Bids were received on April 26, 2001 with the
following results:
|
Contractor |
Base Bid |
Variance Amount |
Over/(Under) Percent |
|
Blossom Valley Construction,
Inc. (San
José) |
$139,425 |
$26,425 |
23 |
|
Grade Tech, Inc. (San
Ramon) |
$116,800 |
$3,800 |
3 |
|
Engineer’s Estimate |
$113,000 |
--- |
--- |
|
Bellicitti and Pellicciotti
Construction Co., Inc. (Santa
Clara) |
$112,485 |
$515 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The low bid submitted by
Bellicitti & Pellicciotti Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of
$112,485 is less than one percent below the Engineer’s Estimate. All bid documents were evaluated and found
to be in order. The contractor
has been contacted regarding the bid and he has indicated that the plans were
interpreted correctly and the bid is valid as submitted. Staff considers this to be an acceptable bid
for the work involved in the construction of this proposed project. A $5,000
contingency is also
requested for any unforeseen conditions which may arise during construction of
this project.
A contingency of $5,000 is requested for any
unforeseen conditions that may arise during the construction of this project.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
This proposed project was
listed on the City’s Internet Bid Line and advertised in the San JoseJosé Mercury News and San JoseJosé Post Record. Bid
packages for all Department of Public Works construction projects are routinely
provided to a standard list of various contractor organizations, builder’s
exchanges, and disadvantaged business organizations, including United Minority
Business Enterprises and the San JoseJosé Minority Business
Development Center.
City staff has coordinated
this project with the Council District 10 Office for the proposed landscape
improvements and the proposed plan was reviewed and approved by the adjacent
neighborhood.
COORDINATION
This proposed project has been coordinated with the
State Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and between
the Departments of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement and; Transportation; the Redevelopment Agency,; and the Offices of the Risk Manager, Equality
Assurance, and the City Attorney.
COST IMPLICATIONS
1. COST
OF RECOMMENDATION: $112,485
2. COST
OF PROJECT:
Project
Development $ 2,000
Design
& Construction Management 30,000
Construction 112,485
Construction Contingency 5,000
Design
& Construction Management 30,000
TOTAL $149,485
3. SOURCE OF FUNDING: 429
- Building and
Construction Tax - Route 87 Highway Improvements
4.
ESTIMATED START DATE OF
CONSTRUCTION: July 2001
5.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE OF
CONSTRUCTION: December 2001
BUDGET REFERENCE
Fund: 429
APPN: 6817
RC: 114543
Amount: $150,000
Budget Document: 2000-01
Appropriation
Ordinance, Section 6.05, item 3 (Z24)
NONDISCRIMINATION
The City of San José Nondiscrimination Requirements
are included in this project as required by Section 4.08 of the San José
Municipal Code.
CEQA
CEQA: Exempt.
RAJEEV BATRA
Acting Director, Department of Public Works
KT/SP/TMc
[branham87ccmm4.doc]
attachment
ANALYSIS
Bids were
received on June 1, 2000 with the following results:
Over/
Variances (Under)
Contractor Base Bid Amount Percent
Gen-Con $15,160,000 $4,927,000 48
Building
Contractors
(Campbell)
Top Grade $14,889,500 $4,656,500 45
Construction,
Inc.,
(Livermore)
Flintco,
Inc. $14,674,731 $4,441,731 43
(Rancho
Cordova)
Granite $14,104,600 $3,871,600 38
Construction,
Inc.
(San Jose)
West Bay $12,850,619 $2,617,619 25
Builders,
Inc.
(San
Rafael)
Engineer’s $10,685,000 ---
--
Estimate
The low
bid submitted by West Bay Builders, Inc. in the amount of $12,850,619 is 25
percent over the Engineer’s Estimate. The City received a A letter was
forwarded from West Bay Builders to City, staff dated June
5, 2000, stating that a clerical error was made under Item 16 of their bid proposal,: Clubhouse and Related Sitework, an error in the amount of $300,000. The
Contractor provided supplemental documentation to justify their claim of an
errorsupporting their error. In addition, staff discovered a clerical error in the
Contractor’s bid proposal under bid line item
10,: Bridge Construction. Subsequently, the Contractor submitted a letter, dated June 19,
2000, requesting to be
released from their bid and return
of their Bidder’s Bond fee. The clerical error consisted of the deletion of a digit, an error in the amount of $420,300.
Upon review of the claims of error and
documentation to justify the claims, staff concludes that the first claim was not sufficiently justified by documentation provided by the Contractor. The second claim of error for the Bridge Construction item is a
clear clerical error. Staff therefore recommends that the low bid contractor be released
from their bid and that the Bidders Bond fee be
returned.
The lowest responsive bid submitted byThe second low
bidder, Granite Construction, Inc., in the amount of
$14,104,600, is submitted a bid that was 38 percent above the Engineer’s Estimate, or
approximately one and one-quarter million dollars above the low bidder. Staff has estimated that the economic feasibility proforma
for the project cannot
support a project with construction costs within this range.
In
discussing this concern with the City Attorney’s Office, Although the five bids
varied in a number of areas, there were at least two trends identified across
the bids. The first is that the “golf
course” bid items, which were estimated to be approximately 50 percent of the
overall construction cost amount, were fairly consistent with the Engineer’s
Estimate for those items. The bids for
those items range from between 3 to17 percent above the Engineer’s Estimate.
The second trend is that the “structures” bid
items, which include the clubhouse, driving range, cart barn and maintenance
yard facilities, were all greatly over the Engineer’s Estimate for those
items. The bids for those items range from
between 16 to119 percent above the Engineer’s Estimate.
Staff interviewed the contractors that submitted the two lowest bids to discuss the results. They confirmed
that the structural components bid items were significantly higher than the
estimate. They attributed the high
costs to the extremely high level of construction activity in this region that
has generally driven up costs, especially for the building trades, such as
concrete work, framing, electrical, and plumbing. Contractors had difficulty in attracting subcontract proposals for
the various trades due to the current level of
construction activity and to an existing backlog of work.
staff believes
that the clearest course of action is to reject all bids, repackage the bid documents, and rebid the project.
It is expected that a report on the rebid of the
project can be forwarded to the City Council on the September 12, 2000 Agenda. In that case, the completion of this project
will
be
in
June, 2002, approximately six months later than the originally anticipated
date. Although it
is anticipated that the City would lose only three months with award of
contract, the construction will be delayed a minimum of six months due to
length of time required for the turf establishment and maintenance period within the
desirable growing conditions in Spring 2002.
Rebidding the project is not
expected to result in lower bids due
to the continuing and
growing backlog of construction work
in the region. Delay in award of a
contract may alter the currently favorable bonding conditions for the project. A delay of three to six months is expected to have a
disproportionate delay for completion of construction because the project will start construction during the fall/winter of this
year, missing the favorable summer construction period. And with such a
delay, the project will miss the optimum spring/summer growing season for turf and therefore turf
establishment will take longer.
Staff
recommends awarding to the lowest responsive bidder, Granite Construction, Inc.
Staff proposes a construction contingency budget in the amount of $750,000 to respond to
unforeseen conditions that may arise during construction.
Median
Island Improvements - Phase 4 Re-Bid consists of three median islands sites located
throughout the City. These sites are
the last three sites to be completed of six median islands that were budgeted
for design and construction in the 1998-99 fFiscal yYear. The first three median islands were awarded
September 1999 as one package consisting of Blossom Hill Road, Mabury Road and
Santa Teresa Boulevard. The remaining
three median islands are packaged as one project and consist of the following
sites:
Keyes
Street from Eleventh Street to Senter Road in Council District 3
Senter
Road from Story Road to Alma Avenue in Council Districts 3 and 7
White
Road from Tully Road to Norwood Avenue in Council District 8
Improvements
to the median islands at Keyes Street and Senter Road include minor demolition
work, construction of turn lanes, repairs to curbs, decorative paving, tree -plantings,
and irrigation installation. At White
Road, a median island will be constructed with decorative paving, tree- planting
and irrigation. Median islands at all
three locations have been designed in conformance with the City’s median island
landscape standards.
Bids were
received January 27, 2000. On May 2,
2000 City Council rejected all bids due to
ambiguities in the bid specifications and
directed that the
project be re-bid. The
project is currently advertised for re-bid.
Watson Park Soccer
Bowl Irrigation Renovation project is located in central San Jose at the end of
Jackson Street near Highway 101. The
soccer bowl is currently irrigated with manually operated quick coupling valves
that require extensive labor. This
manual irrigation system also requires that the irrigation be done during
normal daytime work hours. In order to
irrigate at night and minimize labor costs, an automatic irrigation system has
been proposed. In addition, there are
currently no drinking fountains within the soccer bowl area. This project will install drinking fountains
on both sides of the soccer field.
This proposed project
will provide an automatic irrigation system and drinking fountains within the
soccer bowl area.
The scope of work for
this project includes removal of the manually operated quick coupling valves,
installation of new automatic irrigation and controller, and two drinking
fountains. The construction of the
improvements is scheduled to start on May 1, 2000 after the completion of the
normal soccer season.
ANALYSIS
may have biddersome on the part of some or all of the biddersBids
were received on March 30, 2000 with the following results:
Base Variance Over/Under
Contractor Bid Amount Percent
RMT Landscape
Contractors, Inc. $195,231 $50,231 35
(San Leandro)
Lone Star Landscape 190,240 44,240 30
(San Jose)
West Coast
Engineering, Inc. 185,310 39,310 27
(Santa Clara)
Blossom Valley Constr.,
Inc. 157,130 11,130 7
(San Jose)
Engineer's Estimate 146,000 ---- ----
Robt.
A. Bothman, Inc. 138,000 8,000 (5)
(San Jose)
Boulder Rock Landscape $129,540 $16,460 (11)
(San Jose)
The low bidder,
Boulder Rock Landscape, submitted a bid amount of $129,540, which is eleven
percent below the Engineer’s Estimate.
The Project Manager anticipated higher electrical installation costs
based on similar projects. The bid is
considered to be acceptable for the work involved in the proposed project.
A contingency in the
amount of $8,000 is requested for unforeseen conditions that may arise during
construction.
The base
bid scope of work for these sites includes demolition and site preparation,
construction of median, road repair for turn lane extensions, hardscape
installation, tree planting, irrigation installation and a 60-day maintenance
period.
In
addition to the bBase bBid sScope of wWork,
there is one Add Alternate bid item:
Add Alternate Engineer’s Estimate
Story
Road – demolition and site preparation, installation of $29,000
new curbs, and installation of cobblestone paving.
ANALYSIS
A
supplemental
memorandum will be forthcoming after the bid opening on June 1, 2000. A ten percent contingency is requested for
any unforeseen conditions which may arise during construction of this project.
, which will be done at no additional cost by the
design consultant..on this project Rajapan & Meyer
based on their previous expertise on similar projects. a firm which had previously
performed well in order to offset City staff resource deficiencies. The fee negotiated reflects a premium for this firm’s superior ability to manage an expedited schedule. much plus the consultant’s
fee ($174,000) and
consultant (totaling approximately 31%
rather than a more common 25%-30% on a job of this size) In addition, the consultant’s
performance affected the project schedule by delaying construction four months.
Staff has meet with the
firm and they have agreed to correct the plans and specifications for rebidding at no additional cost to the City. They have
also agreed to a discounted their fee, should if they arebe given the opportunity to work on a future projects with the
City. The basis for discounting their fees will be
subject future negotiation with the
City. to ensure its
completion this year
PUBLIC
OUTREACH
PUBLIC
OUTREACH
During the development of the Master Plan, the project was
presented by City staff at several Council District 7 neighborhood meetings,
during which, the plan for the golf course was discussed and staff received
comments on the project. A generally-noticed
public meeting was held on
June 18, 1998. Additionally, meetings were held with neighborhood
representatives at various times during the development of the proposed Master
Plan, most recently on May 4, 2000.
In the fall of 1998, staff met
with special interest environmental advocates
to solicit input on the project, including the Santa Clara Valley Audubon
Society and the Guadalupe-Coyote Resource
Conservation District.
Staff also presented the project
to the Watershed Management Initiative
Land Use Committee on September 8, 1999, to receive input on the
proposed Master Plan.
Residents and property owners
within a 1000-foot radius of the project site were noticed in advance, of the
Planning Commission and City Council meetings during which the proposed project
was considered. In addition, the Tuers-Capitol Golf Course Master Plan
item on the City Council Agenda was noticed in the San Jose Mercury News.
INSERT STATEMENT APPROPRIATE FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT – Get from Loren, Susan, Arlene,
etc. Modify as appropriate for how the outreach to contractors was done
for this specific project –
such as
about the pre-qualifying golf course contractors.
COORDINATION
This
proposed project has been coordinated between the Departments of Conventions,
Arts, and Entertainment, Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services, Planning,
Building and Code Enforcement, Public Works, Finance, Environmental Services,
Fire, and Streets
and Traffic; and the Offices of the City Manager, and the
City Attorney.
The
project was listed on the City’s Internet Bid Line and advertised in the San Jose
Mercury News and San Jose
Post Record. Bid packages for all Department of Public
Works construction projects are routinely provided to a standard list of
various contractor organizations, builder’s exchanges and disadvantaged
business organizations, including United Minority Business Enterprises and the
San Jose Minority Business Development Center.
COORDINATION
This
proposed project has been coordinated with the Offices of the City Attorney,
Risk Manager, and Equality Assurance, and the dDepartments
of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, and Streets and Traffic.
This proposed project
has been coordinated with the Departments of Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood
Services, Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, General Services, and the
Offices of the City Attorney, Risk Manager, and Equality Assurance.
COST
IMPLICATIONS
1. COST OF RECOMMENDATION: Engineer’s Estimate: $14,104,600$ 10,685495,000000$129,540
2. COST OF PROJECT:
Project Development $607,00(0 *)
Construction
Estimate $14,104,60010,685,$495,000000129,540
Design and Construction Management
* 1,769,30868437,000 *
Consultant
Agreement ** 110,000
Contingency 750, 50,000
Bonding 427,000
Permit Fees 30,000
Habitat Mitigation 350,000
P.G.& E. Facilities Relocation 110,000
Relocation of
City Facilities 2,000,000
FF&E Budget 1,500,000
Water
Meter 8,6008,000
TOTAL $16774247,618,228,00000
174,540
* Design management of $16,000 expended in FY 98-99
***
Funds for Project Development, and Design
of the project . . . . . . . . Consultant fees encumbered in FY
98-99
3. SOURCE OF FUNDING: 391001380 - Construction
and Conveyance Fund,
Citywide ParksGeneral
FundConstruction and Conveyance Fund,
001465 - General
FundConstruction
Excise Tax Fund
429518 - Municipal Golf Course Fund
500 - Water Utility Capital Fund ???
398 - Construction
and Conveyance, Park Maintenance
TBD- Bond
Proceeds (Construction) Building and Structure Tax Fund Council District 3
4. ESTIMATED START DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: AugustMay 2000
5. ESTIMATED
COMPLETION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: November JanuarySeptember 20010
BUDGET REFERENCE**
Fund: 391001380
APPN: xxxx643749726522
RC: xxxxxx106083056223107223
Amount: $1,22554,00000,000
Budget Document: 1999-2000 Adopted CapitalOperating Budget, page 389, item
20
712ppropriation
Ordinance 25916
Page 146, Item 2(l).
Fund: 518465
APPN: 6631 6233 66326505
RC: 103071 105806 110023100943
Amount: $1,139350,000 (Total)000
Budget Document: 1999-2000 Adopted
Operating Budget, Page 859ppropriation
Ordinance 25979
November 2, 1999, Section 2.4, item 2q
Fund: 001429
APPN: 4482 4782 64375108
RC: TBD 11016 TBD TBD3
Amount: $100128,000 $620,000 $150,000
Budget Document: 1999-2000 Adopted Operating Budget pages 710 &
711. Adopted Capital Budget, page 655, item 34
Fund: 500
APPN: 6433
RC: 101033
Amount: $505,000
Budget
Document: 1999-2000 Adopted Capital
Budget, page 770, item 8
Fund: 398
APPN: 6439
RC: 106463
Amount: $250,000
Budget
Document: 1999-2000 Adopted Capital
Budget, Page 437, item 3
Fund: TBD
APPN: TBD
RC: TBD
Amount: $14,680,000
Budget
Document: Net Bond Proceeds
NONDISCRIMINATION
The City of San José Nondiscrimination Requirements
are included in this project as required by Section 4.08 of the San José
Municipal Code.
CEQA
CEQA: E.Ixempt.R.: PP no. 98-03-064
RALPH A. QUALLS, JR.
Director, of Public
Works
Department
KT:KJ:TMcLkj:ls
lr
P_MemoCmemocoyotephmmccT-CGC award 2nd bidder..doc