COUNCIL AGENDA: 5-2-00

ITEM:

Memorandum

To: HONORABLE MAYOR From: Ralph A. Qualls, Jr.

AND CITY COUNCIL

Subject: SEE BELOWWATSON PARK SOCCER BOWL Date: April 12, 2000

IRRIGATION RENOVATION

Approved Date:

COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3, 7, 8

SUBJECT

MMedianEDIAN IslandSLAND ImprovementMPROVEMENTSs – PhaseHASE 4 (KeyesEYES StreetTREET, SenterENTER

To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND From: Rajeev Batralph A. Qualls, Jr.

CITY COUNCIL

Subject: COLEMAN, NARVAEZ, ANDTUERS-CAPITOL GOLF COURSESEE BELOW Date: 054-3012-56-1229320-010

WHITE MEDIAN ISLAND

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS

Approved Date

---------------------DRAFT - 6/19/00----------------------

COUNCIL DISTRICTS: 3, 7, 8

SUBJECTREASON FOR ADDENDUM

To expedite the award of the contract allowing construction to start in at the earliest opportunity during the dry summer season.TUERS-CAPITOL GOLF COURSEMEDIAN ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS – PHASE 4 RE-BID (KEYES STREET, SENTER

RoadOAD andAND WhiteHITE RoadOAD)

RECOMMENDATION

Report on bids and award of contract for the Watson Park Soccer Bowl Irrigation Renovation project to the low bidder, Boulder Rock Landscape Construction in the amount of $129,540, and approval of a contingency in the amount of $8,000. CEQA: Exempt

Report on bids and andauthorization for the City Manager to award approvala contract to reject all bidsbids and award of contract for the Median Island Improvements – Phase 4 Re-Bid pPproject to the low bidder and approval of Tuers-Capitol Golf Course to the lowest responsive bidder, Granite Construction, Inc., for the base bid in the amount of $14,104,600 and a contingency in the amount of $750,000. The award of the contract will be subject to the availability of proceeds from the sale of bonds.. a ten percent contingency.

CEQA: E.I.R.xempt.

BACKGROUND

On May 30, 2000, the City Council approved the Master Plan for the Tuers-Capitol Golf Course, upheld the certification of the Environmental Impact Report, and approved bond financing for the construction of the golf course.

The subject project would construct the approved golf course.

The site for the proposed Tuers-Capitol Golf Course, formerly referred to as Coyote Creek Golf Course, has been the subject of a variety of planning and design efforts over the past 20 years. These efforts have focused on the development of an 18-hole public golf course facility. The subject project proposes to develop such a course, to serve San Jose residents as well as the regional population and visitors to the San Jose area.

Over the years of planning, the project and site have been informally referred to as the Coyote Creek Golf Course. As design of the project progressed, the working name of the project was changed to Tuers-Capitol Golf Course, based on its street location. The name change avoids preconceptions about the final name of the proposed facility and also avoids confusion of this project with a private golf course facility in the region.

In an effort to meet the demand for golf course facilities, the proposed 18-hole public golf course will add to the City’s inventory of recreational facilities, with the objective that it be affordable, serve a wide range of golf skills and ability, and become financially self sustaining as soon as possible. The project under consideration was initiated by City Council and has had continuing oversight and review by either City Council or a three-member City Council Golf Facilities Task Force.

The proposed site for development is the 180 acres that is bounded by Tuers Road on the east, Capitol Expressway on the south, Lone Bluff Way on the west, and to the north by a Pacific Gas & Electric Company substation and Stonegate Park. The site is bordered on its east and west boundaries by residential neighborhoods. An outstanding feature of the site is Coyote Creek, which bisects it, running south to north. The creek sits within a substantial riparian corridor consisting of dense, indigenous vegetation, which serves as habitat for a variety of wildlife. This segment of Coyote Creek is within the Coyote Creek Park Chain, which continues both to the north and to the south of the subject site.

The project site is comprised of land owned by the City of San Jose. Of the total acreage of the site, approximately 80 acres (44%) is considered riparian corridor or riparian corridor setback and is restricted from development under the City’s Riparian Corridor Policy. The golf course project is proposed to be developed on the remaining 100 acres, which is just adequate for such a facility.

In January 1997, the City began preparing a Conceptual Plan for a golf course on this site. That plan was approved by City Council in December 1997, along with the Market and Financial Analysis for the proposed project. In January 1998, the City Council authorized the initial funding to complete an environmental impact report (EIR), a master plan, and further develop the design for preparation of construction documents.

The EIR and the master plan for the proposed Tuers-Capitol Golf Course were prepared concurrently with the final construction documents. The project has been designed to address procedures and requirements for development adjacent to the creek, addressing all environmental concerns associated with the development of the golf course. Certification of the EIR for this project, by the Planning Commission, occurred on April 25, 2000 and was presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission on May 10, 2000. The action taken by the Parks and Recreation Commission was a recommendation to approve the Tuers-Capitol Golf Course Master Plan. The City Council approved the Environmental Impact Report for this project, the Master Plan, and the Financing Report for the Project on

May 30, 2000.

The proposed golf course project will construct the following facilities:

1.Golf Course: 18-hole Par 68, 5,515-yard in length that includes

nine - Par 3, four - Par 4, five - Par 5 holes; a cart path links all tees and greens.

1.Practice Facilities: a putting green and a lighted two-tier driving range with 53 tee stations and a training room;

1.Clubhouse: with a pro shop, a kitchen with setup for catering services, indoor/outdoor dining and event space, and provisions for bar service;

1.Parking Lot and Operational Facilities: including 151 vehicle spaces and 20 temporary event spaces.

The 18-hole golf course routing splits the holes between the east and west sides of Coyote Creek. Eleven of the holes are on the east side of the creek and seven are on the west side. A single bridge crossing the creek will be traversed back and forth twice, once each for the front nine and the back nine holes. The course is designed with the Numbers “1” and “10” tees and the Numbers “9” and “18” greens adjacent to the clubhouse.

The scope of work for the construction of this project includes: site preparation and demolition, erosion control, fencing, grading, storm and sanitary drainage, bridge construction, asphalt-concrete work, concrete work, irrigation, planting, site lighting and electrical work, utility relocations and modifications, architectural structures, lake and stream water construction, public art, and site signage and furniture.

COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8 & 10

SUBJECT: COLEMAN, NARVAEZ, AND WHITE MEDIAN ISLAND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS

COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8 & 10

RECOMMENDATION

Report on bids and award of contract for the construction of the Coleman, Narvaez, and White Median Island Landscape Improvements Pproject to the low bidder, Blossom Valley Construction Company, Inc., to include the base bid and Add Alternate Nos. 1 and 2 in the amount of $1,201,015, and approval of a $90,000 contingency. CEQA: Exempt.

BACKGROUND

The Coleman Road Median Island Landscape Improvement project is located on Coleman Road between Sentinel and Porto Alegre Roads. The Santa Clara Valley Water District Percolation Ponds and Guadalupe Creek border this section of Coleman Road on the north (map attached). To the south, the road is bordered by backside facing residential development consisting of fences, soundwalls and landscaping.

Within the work limits of this project, Coleman Road winds from east to west, roughly paralleling the Guadalupe Creek. The road has two lanes in each direction east of Meridian Avenue and one lane in each direction west of Meridian Avenue. The westbound and eastbound lanes are presently divided by lane striping or by an unimproved median consisting of dirt, asphalt, and gravel. The proposed project will create new median islands to provide visual enhancements to this corridor.

The Narvaez Avenue Median Island Landscape Improvement project is located on Narvaez Avenue, between Capitol Expressway and Naomi Court. Narvaez Avenue is a local thoroughfare that connects Capitol Expressway to Branham Lane and is located directly east of Route 87 and west of residential development. A raised concrete median island exists between Capitol Expressway and the Route 87 Park- and- Ride entrance, and a dirt and gravel-f filled median island exists along the curved portion of Narvaez Avenue between the VTA Park-and-Ride entrance and Naomi Court.

The White Road Median Island Landscape Improvement project is located on White Road between Martens Avenue and Tully Road. The median island is presently a series of raised concrete median islands filled with gravel, asphalt, and dirt. The project site is bordered by Lake Cunningham to the west, between Tully and Cunningham Drive, and is bordered by Pleasant Hills Golf Course to the east, between Tully and Cunningham Drive. Residential and commercial property is located along White Road, on both the east and west sides between Cunningham Drive and Martens Avenue.

The scope of work for the Coleman Road median island project consists of the construction of new median islands and includes demolition of asphalt-concrete pavement, removal of soil, grading and compaction, installation of concrete curbs, topsoil, planting, irrigation, paving materials, and maintenance.

The scope of work for Narvaez Avenue and White Road median island landscape project consists of the installation of landscape planting, paving materials, irrigation, and maintenance in the existing median islands.

In addition to the base bid, there are two Add Alternate items included in the project:

Add Alternate No. 1: Concrete maintenance band – Narvaez Avenue

Add Alternate No. 2: Concrete maintenance band – Coleman Road

ANALYSIS

Bids were received on May 17, 2001 with the following results:

Contractor	Base Bid	Add Alt. No. 1	Add Alt. No. 2	Total Bid	Variance es Amount	Over/ (Under) Percent
Lonestar Landscape, Inc. (San Martin)	$1,751,850	$66,500	$10,825	$1,828,350	$659,350	64
Blossom Valley Construction, Inc. (San Jose)	$1,107,890	$82,30010,000	10,000$82,300	$1,201,015	$32,015	2
Engineer’s Estimate	$1,097,000	$ 10,000	$ 62,000	$1,169,000	-- ---	---

The low bid submitted by Blossom Valley Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $1,201,015 is two percent above the Engineer’s Estimate. All bid documents were evaluated and found to be in order. The contractor has been contacted regarding the bid and he has indicated that the plans were interpreted correctly and the bid is valid as submitted. Staff considers this to be an acceptable bid for the work involved in the construction of this proposed project.

A contingency of $90,000 is requested for any unforeseen conditions that may arise during the construction of this project.

PUBLIC OUTREACH

This proposed project was listed on the City’s Internet Bid Line and advertised in the San JoseJosé Mercury News and San JoseJosé Post Record. Bid packages for all Department of Public Works construction projects are routinely provided to a standard list of various contractor organizations, builder’s exchanges, and disadvantaged business organizations, including United Minority Business Enterprises and the San JoseJosé Minority Business Development Center.

The Median Island Landscape Improvement projects are part of the Median Island Landscape program that has been implemented according to priorities set forth within each Council District.

COORDINATION

This proposed project has been coordinated with the Departments of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement,; Transportation,; and the Offices of Council District 8 and 10, the Risk Manager, Equality Assurance, and the City Attorney.

COST IMPLICATIONS

1. COST OF RECOMMENDATION: $1,201,015

2. COST OF PROJECT:

Project Development $ 0

Design & Construction Management 306,000

Construction 1,201,015

Construction Contingency 90,000

Design & Construction Management 306,000

TOTAL $1,597,015

3. SOURCE OF FUNDING: 001 - Traffic C.I.P.

429 - Council District 10

4. ESTIMATED START DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: August 2001

5. ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: March 2002

BUDGET REFERENCE

Coleman Road

Fund: 001

APPN: 6763

RC: 113873

Amount: $866,000

Budget Document: 2000-01 Appropriation Ordinance, section 2.26, item 7(f)

Narvaez Road

Fund: 001

APPN: 6785

RC: 113863

Amount: $165,000

Budget Document: 2000-01 Appropriation Ordinance, section 2.26, item 7(z09).

White Road

Fund: 001

APPN: 6791

RC: 113653

Amount: $575,000

Budget Document: 2000-01 Appropriation Ordinance, section 2.26, item 7(z14).

NONDISCRIMINATION

The City of San José Nondiscrimination Requirements are included in this project as required by Chapter 4.08 of the San José Municipal Code.

CEQA

CEQA: Exempt.

RAJEEV BATRA

Acting Director, Department of Public Works

KT/SP/TMc

[colemanccmm.doc]

attachment

ANALYSIS

Bids were received on June 1, 2000 with the following results:

Over/

Variances (Under)

Contractor Base Bid Amount Percent

Gen-Con $15,160,000 $4,927,000 48

Building

Contractors

(Campbell)

Top Grade $14,889,500 $4,656,500 45

Construction,

Inc.,

(Livermore)

Flintco, Inc. $14,674,731 $4,441,731 43

(Rancho

Cordova)

Granite $14,104,600 $3,871,600 38

Construction,

Inc.

(San Jose)

West Bay $12,850,619 $2,617,619 25

Builders,

Inc.

(San Rafael)

Engineer’s $10,685,000 --- --

Estimate

The low bid submitted by West Bay Builders, Inc. in the amount of $12,850,619 is 25 percent over the Engineer’s Estimate. The City received a A letter was forwarded from West Bay Builders to City, staff dated June 5, 2000, stating that a clerical error was made under Item 16 of their bid proposal,: Clubhouse and Related Sitework, an error in the amount of $300,000. The Contractor provided supplemental documentation to justify their claim of an errorsupporting their error. In addition, staff discovered a clerical error in the Contractor’s bid proposal under bid line item 10,: Bridge Construction. Subsequently, the Contractor submitted a letter, dated June 19, 2000, requesting to be released from their bid and return of their Bidder’s Bond fee. The clerical error consisted of the deletion of a digit, an error in the amount of $420,300.

Upon review of the claims of error and documentation to justify the claims, staff concludes that the first claim was not sufficiently justified by documentation provided by the Contractor. The second claim of error for the Bridge Construction item is a clear clerical error. Staff therefore recommends that the low bid contractor be released from their bid and that the Bidders Bond fee be returned.

The lowest responsive bid submitted byThe second low bidder, Granite Construction, Inc., in the amount of $14,104,600, is submitted a bid that was 38 percent above the Engineer’s Estimate, or approximately one and one-quarter million dollars above the low bidder. Staff has estimated that the economic feasibility proforma for the project cannot support a project with construction costs within this range.

In discussing this concern with the City Attorney’s Office, Although the five bids varied in a number of areas, there were at least two trends identified across the bids. The first is that the “golf course” bid items, which were estimated to be approximately 50 percent of the overall construction cost amount, were fairly consistent with the Engineer’s Estimate for those items. The bids for those items range from between 3 to17 percent above the Engineer’s Estimate.

The second trend is that the “structures” bid items, which include the clubhouse, driving range, cart barn and maintenance yard facilities, were all greatly over the Engineer’s Estimate for those items. The bids for those items range from between 16 to119 percent above the Engineer’s Estimate.

Staff interviewed the contractors that submitted the two lowest bids to discuss the results. They confirmed that the structural components bid items were significantly higher than the estimate. They attributed the high costs to the extremely high level of construction activity in this region that has generally driven up costs, especially for the building trades, such as concrete work, framing, electrical, and plumbing. Contractors had difficulty in attracting subcontract proposals for the various trades due to the current level of construction activity and to an existing backlog of work.

staff believes that the clearest course of action is to reject all bids, repackage the bid documents, and rebid the project.

It is expected that a report on the rebid of the project can be forwarded to the City Council on the September 12, 2000 Agenda. In that case, the completion of this project will be in June, 2002, approximately six months later than the originally anticipated date. Although it is anticipated that the City would lose only three months with award of contract, the construction will be delayed a minimum of six months due to length of time required for the turf establishment and maintenance period within the desirable growing conditions in Spring 2002.

Rebidding the project is not expected to result in lower bids due to the continuing and growing backlog of construction work in the region. Delay in award of a contract may alter the currently favorable bonding conditions for the project. A delay of three to six months is expected to have a disproportionate delay for completion of construction because the project will start construction during the fall/winter of this year, missing the favorable summer construction period. And with such a delay, the project will miss the optimum spring/summer growing season for turf and therefore turf establishment will take longer.

Staff recommends awarding to the lowest responsive bidder, Granite Construction, Inc.

Staff proposes a construction contingency budget in the amount of $750,000 to respond to unforeseen conditions that may arise during construction.

Median Island Improvements - Phase 4 Re-Bid consists of three median islands sites located throughout the City. These sites are the last three sites to be completed of six median islands that were budgeted for design and construction in the 1998-99 fFiscal yYear. The first three median islands were awarded September 1999 as one package consisting of Blossom Hill Road, Mabury Road and Santa Teresa Boulevard. The remaining three median islands are packaged as one project and consist of the following sites:

Keyes Street from Eleventh Street to Senter Road in Council District 3

Senter Road from Story Road to Alma Avenue in Council Districts 3 and 7

White Road from Tully Road to Norwood Avenue in Council District 8

Improvements to the median islands at Keyes Street and Senter Road include minor demolition work, construction of turn lanes, repairs to curbs, decorative paving, tree -plantings, and irrigation installation. At White Road, a median island will be constructed with decorative paving, tree- planting and irrigation. Median islands at all three locations have been designed in conformance with the City’s median island landscape standards.

Bids were received January 27, 2000. On May 2, 2000 City Council rejected all bids due to ambiguities in the bid specifications and directed that the project be re-bid. The project is currently advertised for re-bid.

Watson Park Soccer Bowl Irrigation Renovation project is located in central San Jose at the end of Jackson Street near Highway 101. The soccer bowl is currently irrigated with manually operated quick coupling valves that require extensive labor. This manual irrigation system also requires that the irrigation be done during normal daytime work hours. In order to irrigate at night and minimize labor costs, an automatic irrigation system has been proposed. In addition, there are currently no drinking fountains within the soccer bowl area. This project will install drinking fountains on both sides of the soccer field.

This proposed project will provide an automatic irrigation system and drinking fountains within the soccer bowl area.

The scope of work for this project includes removal of the manually operated quick coupling valves, installation of new automatic irrigation and controller, and two drinking fountains. The construction of the improvements is scheduled to start on May 1, 2000 after the completion of the normal soccer season.

ANALYSIS

may have biddersome on the part of some or all of the biddersBids were received on March 30, 2000 with the following results:

Base Variance Over/Under

Contractor Bid Amount Percent

RMT Landscape Contractors, Inc. $195,231 $50,231 35

(San Leandro)

Lone Star Landscape 190,240 44,240 30

(San Jose)

West Coast Engineering, Inc. 185,310 39,310 27

(Santa Clara)

Blossom Valley Constr., Inc. 157,130 11,130 7

(San Jose)

Engineer's Estimate 146,000 ---- ----

Robt. A. Bothman, Inc. 138,000 8,000 (5)

(San Jose)

Boulder Rock Landscape $129,540 $16,460 (11)

(San Jose)

The low bidder, Boulder Rock Landscape, submitted a bid amount of $129,540, which is eleven percent below the Engineer’s Estimate. The Project Manager anticipated higher electrical installation costs based on similar projects. The bid is considered to be acceptable for the work involved in the proposed project.

A contingency in the amount of $8,000 is requested for unforeseen conditions that may arise during construction.

The base bid scope of work for these sites includes demolition and site preparation, construction of median, road repair for turn lane extensions, hardscape installation, tree planting, irrigation installation and a 60-day maintenance period.

In addition to the bBase bBid sScope of wWork, there is one Add Alternate bid item:

Add Alternate Engineer’s Estimate

Story Road – demolition and site preparation, installation of $29,000

new curbs, and installation of cobblestone paving.

ANALYSIS

A supplemental memorandum will be forthcoming after the bid opening on June 1, 2000. A ten percent contingency is requested for any unforeseen conditions which may arise during construction of this project.

, which will be done at no additional cost by the design consultant..on this project Rajapan & Meyer based on their previous expertise on similar projects. a firm which had previously performed well in order to offset City staff resource deficiencies. The fee negotiated reflects a premium for this firm’s superior ability to manage an expedited schedule. much plus the consultant’s fee ($174,000) and consultant (totaling approximately 31% rather than a more common 25%-30% on a job of this size) In addition, the consultant’s performance affected the project schedule by delaying construction four months.

Staff has meet with the firm and they have agreed to correct the plans and specifications for rebidding at no additional cost to the City. They have also agreed to a discounted their fee, should if they arebe given the opportunity to work on a future projects with the City. The basis for discounting their fees will be subject future negotiation with the City. to ensure its completion this year

PUBLIC OUTREACH

PUBLIC OUTREACH

During the development of the Master Plan, the project was presented by City staff at several Council District 7 neighborhood meetings, during which, the plan for the golf course was discussed and staff received comments on the project. A generally-noticed public meeting was held on June 18, 1998. Additionally, meetings were held with neighborhood representatives at various times during the development of the proposed Master Plan, most recently on May 4, 2000.

In the fall of 1998, staff met with special interest environmental advocates to solicit input on the project, including the Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society and the Guadalupe-Coyote Resource Conservation District. Staff also presented the project to the Watershed Management Initiative Land Use Committee on September 8, 1999, to receive input on the proposed Master Plan.

Residents and property owners within a 1000-foot radius of the project site were noticed in advance, of the Planning Commission and City Council meetings during which the proposed project was considered. In addition, the Tuers-Capitol Golf Course Master Plan item on the City Council Agenda was noticed in the San Jose Mercury News.

INSERT STATEMENT APPROPRIATE FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT – Get from Loren, Susan, Arlene, etc. Modify as appropriate for how the outreach to contractors was done for this specific project – such as about the pre-qualifying golf course contractors.

COORDINATION

This proposed project has been coordinated between the Departments of Conventions, Arts, and Entertainment, Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services, Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, Public Works, Finance, Environmental Services, Fire, and Streets and Traffic; and the Offices of the City Manager, and the City Attorney.

The project was listed on the City’s Internet Bid Line and advertised in the San Jose Mercury News and San Jose Post Record. Bid packages for all Department of Public Works construction projects are routinely provided to a standard list of various contractor organizations, builder’s exchanges and disadvantaged business organizations, including United Minority Business Enterprises and the San Jose Minority Business Development Center.

COORDINATION

This proposed project has been coordinated with the Offices of the City Attorney, Risk Manager, and Equality Assurance, and the dDepartments of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, and Streets and Traffic.

This proposed project has been coordinated with the Departments of Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services, Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, General Services, and the Offices of the City Attorney, Risk Manager, and Equality Assurance.

COST IMPLICATIONS

1. COST OF RECOMMENDATION: Engineer’s Estimate: $14,104,600$ 10,685495,000000$129,540

2. COST OF PROJECT:

Project Development $607,00(0 *)

Construction Estimate $14,104,60010,685,$495,000000129,540

Design and Construction Management * 1,769,30868437,000 *

Consultant Agreement ** 110,000

Contingency 750, 50,000

Bonding 427,000

Permit Fees 30,000

Habitat Mitigation 350,000

P.G.& E. Facilities Relocation 110,000

Relocation of City Facilities 2,000,000

FF&E Budget 1,500,000

Water Meter 8,6008,000

TOTAL $16774247,618,228,00000

174,540

* Design management of $16,000 expended in FY 98-99

*** Funds for Project Development, and Design of the project . . . . . . . . Consultant fees encumbered in FY 98-99

3. SOURCE OF FUNDING: 391001380 - Construction and Conveyance Fund,

Citywide ParksGeneral FundConstruction and Conveyance Fund,

001465 - General FundConstruction Excise Tax Fund

429518 - Municipal Golf Course Fund

500 - Water Utility Capital Fund ???

398 - Construction and Conveyance, Park Maintenance

TBD- Bond Proceeds (Construction) Building and Structure Tax Fund Council District 3

4. ESTIMATED START DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: AugustMay 2000

5. ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: November JanuarySeptember 20010

BUDGET REFERENCE**

Fund: 391001380

APPN: xxxx643749726522

RC: xxxxxx106083056223107223

Amount: $1,22554,00000,000

Budget Document: 1999-2000 Adopted CapitalOperating Budget, page 389, item 20

712ppropriation Ordinance 25916

Page 146, Item 2(l).

Fund: 518465

APPN: 6631 6233 66326505

RC: 103071 105806 110023100943

Amount: $1,139350,000 (Total)000

Budget Document: 1999-2000 Adopted Operating Budget, Page 859ppropriation Ordinance 25979

November 2, 1999, Section 2.4, item 2q

Fund: 001429

APPN: 4482 4782 64375108

RC: TBD 11016 TBD TBD3

Amount: $100128,000 $620,000 $150,000

Budget Document: 1999-2000 Adopted Operating Budget pages 710 & 711. Adopted Capital Budget, page 655, item 34

Fund: 500

APPN: 6433

RC: 101033

Amount: $505,000

Budget Document: 1999-2000 Adopted Capital Budget, page 770, item 8

Fund: 398

APPN: 6439

RC: 106463

Amount: $250,000

Budget Document: 1999-2000 Adopted Capital Budget, Page 437, item 3

Fund: TBD

APPN: TBD

RC: TBD

Amount: $14,680,000

Budget Document: Net Bond Proceeds

NONDISCRIMINATION

The City of San José Nondiscrimination Requirements are included in this project as required by Section 4.08 of the San José Municipal Code.

CEQA

CEQA: E.Ixempt.R.: PP no. 98-03-064

RALPH A. QUALLS, JR.

Director, of Public Works Department

KT:KJ:TMcLkj:ls

lr

P_MemoCmemocoyotephmmccT-CGC award 2^nd bidder..doc